I-5-4-19.Prue/Weathers, et al. v. Sullivan

Table of Contents
I Purpose
II Background
III Guiding Principles
IV Definition of Class
V Determination of Class Membership and Preadjudication Actions
VI Processing and Adjudication
VII Case Coding
VIII Reconciliation of Implementation
IX Inquiries
Attachment 1 Prue/Weathers v. Sullivan Stipulation and Order; Approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and Filed July 23, 1993.
Attachment 2 - PRUE/WEATHERS COURT CASE FLAG/ALERT
Attachment 3 Prue/Weathers Class Action Case
Attachment 4 PRUE/WEATHERS SCREENING SHEET
Attachment 5 Route Slip for Routing Court Case Alert (and Prior Claim Files)—OHA No Longer Has Current Claims
Attachment 6 Non-Class Membership Notice
Attachment 7 Route Slip for Non-Class Membership Cases
Attachment 8 Acting Associate Commissioner's Memorandum Dated February 21, 1991, Entitled “The Standard for Evaluating 'Not Severe' Impairments.”
Attachment 9 Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication — retention period expired)
Attachment 10 Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication — retention period was not expired)
Attachment 11 ALJ Dismissal to DDS
Attachment 12 Notice Transmitting ALJ Order of Dismissal
Attachment 13 Class Member Flag for HO Use (DDS Readjudication)

ISSUED: June 29, 1994; REVISED: October 4, 1996

I. Purpose

This Temporary Instruction (TI) sets forth procedures for implementing the parties' joint Stipulation and Order in the Prue/Weathers, et al. v. Sullivan class action involving the “not severe” impairment issue. The Stipulation and Order was approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on July 23, 1993.

Adjudicators throughout the country must be familiar with this TI because Prue/Weathers class members who now reside outside of the District of Columbia must have their cases processed in accordance with the requirements of the Stipulation and Order.

II. Background

On March 10, 1986, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, denied the Secretary's cross-motion for summary judgment and certified a class challenging the Secretary's regulations, policies and practices for evaluating disability claims at step two of the sequential evaluation. In addition, the court held that the Secretary's pre-1984 policy of not considering the combined effect of an individual's multiple “not severe” impairments violated the Social Security Act. Accordingly, the court enjoined the Secretary from denying or terminating disability benefits at step two and ordered the Secretary to readjudicate all pending class member claims.

On August 22, 1986, the district court denied the Secretary's motion to alter or amend the judgment to the extent that the Secretary requested the court to: 1) eliminate the requirement that the Secretary reinstate benefits previously terminated; 2) exclude from the class individuals whose benefits were terminated, as distinguished from denied, on the ground that the sole party seeking class relief had her benefits denied, not terminated; and 3) exclude from the class those individuals who had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. However, the court granted the Secretary a partial stay concerning the reinstatement of benefits pending the Secretary's appeal.

On October 30, 1986, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia agreed to stay the briefing schedule and hold the merits of the case in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137 (1987). Furthermore, the court of appeals denied the Secretary's motion for a partial stay with respect to the process of identifying the closed claims referred to in the Secretary's motion and with respect to locating the Agency's files for those claims. However, the court of appeals granted the stay with respect to payment of interim benefits and the further processing and readjudication of previous closed claims.

On September 16, 1987, in response to the Secretary's motion following the Supreme Court's decision in Bowen v. Yuckert, the court of appeals remanded this case to the district court for further consideration in light of Yuckert, but refused to vacate the district court's injunction.

On February 24, 1992, the district court lifted the injunction and dismissed plaintiffs' class action complaint. On March 3, 1992, plaintiffs appealed the district court's dismissal to the court of appeals.

On May 8, 1992, the Associate Commissioner issued a memorandum to all OHA adjudicators informing them of the court's February 24, 1992 order. The memorandum instructed OHA decision makers to resume using the severity step in adjudicating adult disability claims. The memorandum also rescinded TI 5-4-19, Weathers, et al. v. Bowen, which had originally been issued as Staff Guides and Programs Digest Bulletin III-1(86), on July 31, 1986, to provide instructions for implementing the district court's March 10, 1986 order.

While the case was on appeal, the parties negotiated a settlement. On April 26, 1993, pursuant to plaintiffs' unopposed motion, the court of appeals remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings. The circuit court felt that the lower court was in a better position to assess the fairness of the parties' proposed settlement. On July 23, 1993, the district court approved the parties' joint Stipulation and Order setting forth the definition of the class and terms for the implementation of relief (Attachment 1).

III. Guiding Principles

Under Prue/Weathers, the Secretary will redetermine the claims of those persons who: 1) respond to notice informing them of the opportunity for readjudication; and 2) are determined to be class members after screening (see Part V. below). Regardless of the claimant's current state of residence, the Office of Disability and International Operations (ODIO) will, in most cases, screen for class membership and the District of Columbia Disability Determination Service (DDS) will perform the agreed upon readjudications, regardless of the administrative level at which the claim was last decided.

EXCEPTION:

The DDS servicing the claimant's current address will perform the readjudication if a face-to-face review is appropriate, i.e., cessation or terminal illness (TERI) cases.

OHA will screen cases and perform readjudications under limited circumstances (see Part V.B. below).

Cases readjudicated by the DDS will be redetermined at the reconsideration level regardless of the final level at which the case was previously decided. Class members who receive adverse readjudication determinations will have full appeal rights (i.e., Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing, Appeals Council and judicial review).

Prue/Weathers does not require any change in OHA's current adjudicatory policies or practices because Social Security Ruling (SSR) 85-28 remains the proper standard for adjudicating claims at step two of the sequential evaluation.

IV. Definition of Class

Except as noted below, for purposes of implementing the July 23, 1993 Stipulation and Order, the Prue/Weathers class consists of all individuals who:

  • resided in the District of Columbia between July 28, 1984, and March 4, 1985, inclusive; and

  • were issued a final administrative determination or decision denying or terminating title II or title XVI disability benefits based on a finding of “no severe” impairment, i.e., a step two denial.

    EXCEPTION:

    A person is not a class member if

    (1) the last administrative denial or termination the individual received on the potential Prue/Weathers claim was issued after March 4, 1985;

    (2) the last administrative denial or termination the individual received on the potential Prue/Weathers claim was not based on a finding of “no severe” impairment, i.e., a step two denial;

    (3) a federal court affirmed the denial at any time; or

    (4) the individual had a subsequent claim denied after March 4, 1985, and the subsequent claim covered the entire period of disability at issue in the potential Prue/Weathers claim.

V. Determination of Class Membership and Preadjudication Actions

A. Non-OHA Actions

  1. Notification

    On February 18, 1994, SSA sent notices to all potential class members identified by computer run. Individuals have 60 days from the date of receipt of the notice to request that SSA readjudicate their claims under the terms of the Prue/Weathers Stipulation and Order.

    The Office of Disability and International Operations (ODIO) sendS untimely responses to the servicing Social Security field office (i.e., district office or branch office) to develop good cause for the untimely response. Good cause determinations are based on the standards set forth in 20 CFR §§ 404.911 and 416.1411 and SSR 91-5p. If good cause is established, the field office will forward the claim for screening.

    EXCEPTION:

    If a mental impairment (now or in the past) is alleged, ODIO will deem good cause for the untimely response and proceed with screening for class membership.

  2. Alert and Folder Retrieval Process

    All response forms and undeliverable notices will be returned to ODIO where they will be entered into the Civil Action Tracking System (CATS). CATS will generate folder alerts to ODIO for all response forms. See Attachment 2 for a sample Prue/Weathers alert.

    In most instances, ODIO will associate the computer-generated alerts with any claim file(s) that it has within its jurisdiction or that it retrieves from another location. ODIO will then forward class member files to the appropriate office for readjudication.

  3. Alerts Sent to OHA

    If ODIO determines that a current claim, i.e., either a potential class member claim or a subsequent claim, is pending appeal or stored at OHA, it will forward the alert to OHA, along with any prior claim file(s) not in OHA's possession, for screening, consolidation consideration and readjudication (if consolidated).

    ODIO will send all alerts potentially within OHA jurisdiction and related prior claim file(s), if any, to the Office of Appellate Operations (OAO), at the following address (case locator code 5007):

    Office of Hearings and Appeals
    Office of Appellate Operations
    One Sky Tower Suite 701
    5107 Leesburg Pike
    Falls Church, VA 22041-3200

    ATTN: OAO CLass Action Coordinator

    NOTE:

    The OAO Class Action Coordinator is responsible for controlling and reconciling the disposition of class alerts shipped to OHA Headquarters for association with pending or stored claims. The OAO Class Action Coordinator will maintain a record of all alerts received and the location, if any, to which they are transferred. This information will be necessary to do the final class membership reconciliation.

  4. Folder Reconstruction

    Generally, ODIO will initiate any necessary reconstruction of prior claim files through the servicing FO. Consequently, OHA requests for reconstruction of potential Prue/Weathers class member cases should be rare. Prior to requesting reconstruction, OHA will determine whether available systems data or other information provides satisfactory proof that the claim would not confer class membership. However, if it becomes necessary for OHA to request reconstruction, the OHA component (the HO or the OAO Branch) will forward the alert and any accompanying claim file(s) (if the claim file(s) is not needed for adjudication purposes) to the servicing FO, along with documentation of attempts to locate the file and a covering memorandum requesting that the reconstructed file be forwarded to OHA. HOs will route any reconstruction requests directly to the servicing FOs. The OAO branch will route requests to the servicing FO and send copies of all requests to the OAO Class Action Coordinator. For CATS purposes, HO personnel and the OAO Class Action Coordinator will forward a copy of the reconstruction request memorandum to Litigation Staff at the following address:

    Litigation Staff
    Office of Policy and Planning
    3-K-26 Operations Building
    6401 Security Boulevard
    Baltimore, MD 21235

    ATTN: Prue/Weathers Coordinator

    The HO or OAO will not delay action on a pending claim when a prior claim is being reconstructed for screening purposes, unless the claim is needed for the adjudication of the pending claim. If OHA completes action on the pending claim prior to the receipt of the reconstructed file, the HO or OAO, as appropriate, will forward the class action material, including the alert, unneeded claim files, if any, and the reconstruction request to the OAO Class Action Coordinator, along with a copy of the action on the pending claim. For additional information on reconstruction procedures, see the Generic Class Implementation Instructions, HALLEX I-1-7-5C.

  5. Class Membership Denials

    ODIO or OHA will hold all non-class member claim files pending review by class counsel. If an individual wishes to request SSA's further consideration of a class membership denial determination, he or she must do so through class counsel. Class counsel has 60 days from receipt of the notice of non-class membership to notify the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) of their disagreement. Upon timely written request by class counsel (i.e., within 60 days of receipt of the notice of non-class membership) to review the files, Litigation Staff will coordinate with ODIO or OHA to forward the claim files within 30 days of the request, to:

    SSA District Office
    2100 M Street, N.W.
    Washington, D.C. 20203

    NOTE:

    The files may also be sent to another mutually acceptable location.

    Class counsel will then have 30 days to review the file. If class counsel's review establishes that there is a dispute, they must notify OGC. If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, OGC will so notify class counsel. Class counsel may submit any unresolved dispute to the court for final resolution by proper motion made within 30 days of the date of written notice by OGC.

B. OHA Actions

  1. Pre-Screening Actions

    1. Current Claim in OHA

      As provided in Part V.A.3. above, if there is a current claim pending or stored at OHA, the OAO Class Action Coordinator will receive the alert and related Prue/Weathers claim file(s). The OAO Class Action Coordinator will determine OHA jurisdiction for screening and forward as follows.

      • If the current claim is in an HO, the Coordinator will use Attachment 3 to forward the alert and prior claim file(s) to the HO for screening. (Part V.B.2.a. below provides instructions to the HOs regarding the action to be taken if they receive an alert package but no longer have a current claim pending.)

      • If the current claim is before the Appeals Council, or is located in an OAO branch mini-docket or in the OAO Docket and Files Branch, the Coordinator will use Attachment 3 to forward the alert and prior claim file(s) to the appropriate OAO branch for screening. (Part V.B.2.a. below provides instructions to the OAO branches regarding the action to be taken if they receive an alert package from the OAO Class Action Coordinator but no longer have a current claim pending.)

      If the Coordinator (or designee) is unable to locate the current claim file within OHA, the Coordinator (or designee) will broaden its claim file search and arrange for alert transfer or file reconstruction, as necessary.

    2. Current Claim Pending in Court

      If the OAO Class Action Coordinator receives an alert for a claimant who has a civil action pending, either on the alerted case or on another claim, the Coordinator will forward the alert and any accompanying claim file(s) to the appropriate Court Case Preparation and Review Branch (CCPRB) for screening using Attachment 3. See Part V.B.2.b. below for special screening instructions when a civil action is involved.

  2. Screening

    1. General Instructions

      The screening component will associate the alert, if any, and any prior claim file(s) with the claim file(s) in its possession and complete the screening sheet (see Attachment 4) as follows.

      NOTE:

      If the claim pending at OHA is the only potential Prue/Weathers claim, then the individual is not entitled to relief under Prue/Weathers (see Part IV. above). Complete the screening sheet and follow the instructions in Part V.B.3.a. below for processing non-Prue/Weathers claims.

      • Consider all applications denied (including res judicata denials/dismissals) during the Prue/Weathers timeframe;

        NOTE:

        Although not the “final decision of the Secretary,” an Appeals Council denial of a request for review is the last action of the Secretary, and the date of such a denial controls for class membership screening purposes.

      • Follow all instructions on the screening sheet and the screening sheet instructions;

      • Sign and date the original screening sheet; place it in the claim file (on the top right side of the file); and

      • If the screening component is an OHA Headquarters component, forward a copy of the screening sheet to the OAO Class Action Coordinator at the address in Part V.A.3. above. (The Coordinator will enter information from the screening sheet into a database and forward a copy of the screening sheet to the Division of Litigation Analysis and Implementation (DLAI)). If the screening component is an HO, forward a copy of the screening sheet directly to DLAI at the following address:

        Office of Hearing and Appeals
        Division of Litigation Analysis and Implementation
        One Skyline Tower, Suite 702
        5107 Leesburg Pike
        Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

        HO personnel may also forward material by telefax to DLAI at (703) 305-0655. (DLAI will retain a copy of each screening sheet and forward a copy to the OAO Class Action Coordinator and to Litigation Staff.)

      If the HO receives an alert only, or an alert associated with a prior claim file(s), and the HO no longer has the current claim file, it will return or forward the alert and any prior claim file(s) to the OAO Class Action Coordinator (see address in Part V.A.3. above) and advise the Coordinator of the action taken on the current claim and its destination. The Coordinator will determine the current claim file location and, if it is located in OHA Headquarters, will forward the alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) to the responsible OAO Branch for screening, using Attachment 3. If the file(s) is no longer in OHA, the Coordinator will use Attachment 5 to send the alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) to the non-OHA location and request that the file(s) be forwarded to the appropriate DDS for screening.

      If an OAO branch receives an alert only, or an alert associated with a prior claim file(s), and the branch no longer has the current claim file (and it is not located in an OAO branch mini-docket or in the OAO DFB), it will determine the location of the current claim file. If the current claim file is located within OHA, the OAO branch will use Attachment 3 to forward the alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) to the current OHA location. If the file(s) is no longer in OHA, the OAO branch will use Attachment 5 to forward the alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) to the non-OHA location and request that the file(s) be forwarded to the appropriate DDS for screening. The OAO branch will also advise the OAO Class Action Coordinator of its actions.

      NOTE:

      Final determinations or decisions made after March 4, 1984, on a subsequent claim filed by a potential Prue/Weathers class member may have adjudicated the entire timeframe at issue in the Prue/Weathers claim. Instead of applying the doctrine of administrative res judicata to the Prue/Weathers claim, these claims should be denied class membership.

    2. Special OAO Screening Instructions if a Civil Action Is Involved

      As noted in Part V.B.1.b. above, the CCPRB will screen for Prue/Weathers class membership when a civil action is involved. The CCPRB's class membership determination will dictate the appropriate post-screening action.

      • If the claim pending in court was adjudicated in accordance with SSR 85-28 and resolved all Prue/Weathers issues, the claimant is not a Prue/Weathers class member. The CCPRB will follow the instructions in Part V.B.3.a. below for processing non-class member claims.

      • If the claim pending in court was adjudicated in accordance with SSR 85-28, but did not resolve all Prue/Weathers issue(s), e.g., there is a prior (inactive) Prue/Weathers claim and the claim pending in court did not include the entire period covered by the Prue/Weathers claim, and the claimant elects to have the case remanded to the Commissioner for a redetermination (instead of proceeding in court), the CCPRB will forward the Prue/Weathers claim to the District of Columbia DDS for readjudication. The CCPRB will modify the case flag in Attachment 9 to indicate that the pending court case does not resolve all Prue/Weathers issues and that the Prue/Weathers class member claim is being forwarded for separate processing. The CCPRB will notify the OAO Class Action Coordinator of this action.

      • If the final administrative decision on the claim pending in court was not adjudicated in accordance with SSR 85-28 or is legally insufficient for other reasons, the CCPRB will initiate voluntary remand proceedings and consolidate the claims.

  3. Post-Screening Actions

    1. Non-Class Member Cases

      If the screening component determines that the individual is not a class member, the component will:

      • notify the individual, and representative, if any, of non-class membership using Attachment 6 (modified as necessary to fit the facts and posture of the case when there is a current claim);

      NOTE:

      Include the address and telephone number of the servicing Social Security field office at the top of Attachment 6.

      • retain a copy of the notice in the claim file;

      • send a copy of the notice to:

        Michael Schuster, Esq.
        Legal Counsel for the Elderly
        601 E. Street, N.W.
        Washington, D.C. 20049
      • retain the claim file(s) for 90 days pending a possible class membership dispute;

      • if the screening component is not an OHA Headquarters component, and the file(s) is not needed for adjudication, forward the file(s) for storage to OAO at the address in Part V.A.3. above; and

      • if class counsel makes a timely request for review, send the non-class member claim file(s) to the District of Columbia field office (or other mutually acceptable location) using the pre-addressed route slip in Attachment 7.

        NOTE:

        Photocopy any material contained in the prior file that is relevant to the current claim and place it in the current claim file before shipping the prior file.

      • if SSA, through OGC, resolves the dispute in the claimant's favor: 1) the original screening component or Litigation Staff will prepare a revised screening sheet; 2) OHA jurisdiction cases will proceed in accordance with Part VI. below; and 3) the rescreening component will notify DLAI, at the address in Part V.B.2. above, of the revised screening determination by forwarding a copy of the revised screening sheet to DLAI; and 4) DLAI will coordinate with the OAO Class Action Coordinator, as necessary. OGC will notify class counsel of the reversal of class membership, and class counsel will notify the claimant.

      An individual who wishes to appeal a determination of non-class membership may do so only through class counsel, as explained in the notice (Attachment 6).

    2. Cases Determined To Be Class Members

      If the screening component determines that the individual is a class member, it will proceed with processing and adjudication in accordance with the instructions in Part VI. below.

VI. Processing and Adjudication

A. Cases Reviewed by the DDS

The District of Columbia DDS will conduct the first Prue/Weathers review, except for cases consolidated at the OHA level (see Part VI.D. below) and cases in which a face-to-face review is appropriate (see the exception in Part III. above). The DDS determination will be a reconsideration determination regardless of the administrative level at which the class member's claim(s) was previously decided with full appeal rights (i.e., ALJ hearing, Appeals Council and judicial review).

Except as otherwise noted in this instruction, ALJs should process and adjudicate requests for hearing on Prue/Weathers DDS review cases in the same manner as for any other case.

B. OHA Adjudication of Class Member Claims

The following instruction applies to both consolidation cases in which the ALJ or Appeals Council conducts the Prue/Weathers readjudication and to DDS readjudication cases in which the claimant requests a hearing or Appeals Council review. Except as noted herein, HOs and Headquarters will process Prue/Weathers class member cases according to all other current practices and procedures including coding, scheduling, developing evidence, routing, etc.

  1. Type of Review and Period To Be Considered

    1. Pursuant to the Prue/Weathers Stipulation and Order, regardless of whether the claim under review is an initial claim or cessation case, the type of review to be conducted is a redetermination. The readjudication shall be a de novo reevaluation of the class member's eligibility for benefits based on all evidence in his or her file including newly obtained evidence relevant to the period that was at issue in the administrative decision(s) that forms the basis for Prue/Weathers class membership

    2. If the readjudication results in a favorable decision, the adjudicator will determine, under the medical improvement standard, whether the class member's disability has continued through the date of the readjudication (or through the date of onset of disability established in any allowance on a subsequent application)

    3. If the evidence establishes that disability began only at some point after the administrative determination(s)/decision(s) that forms the basis for Prue/Weathers class membership, the class member must file a new application to establish eligibility

  2. Step Two of the Sequential Evaluation

    Prue/Weathers does not require any change in OHA's current adjudicatory policies or practices with respect to step two of the sequential evaluation. Effective with the enactment of the 1984 Amendments to the Social Security Act, OHA's adjudicators have considered the combined effect of individual “not severe” impairments in evaluating disability claims at step two. ALJs and the Appeals Council may, if appropriate, continue to deny or cease the disability claims of District of Columbia residents in accordance with 20 CFR §§ 404.1520(c), 404.1521, 404.1523, 416.920(c), 416.921 and 416.923 as well as SSR 85-28. The Acting Associate Commissioner's memorandum, dated February 21, 1991 (Attachment 8), regarding the proper standard for adjudicating claims at step two, remains in effect.

  3. Class Member Is Deceased

    If a class member is deceased, the usual survivor and substitute party provisions and existing procedures for determining distribution of any potential underpayment apply.

C. Claim at OHA but No Current Action Pending

If the claim file (either a class member or a subsequent claim) is located in OHA Headquarters, but there is no claim actively pending administrative review, i.e., Headquarters is holding the file awaiting potential receipt of a request for review or notification that a civil action has been filed, OAO will associate the alert with the file and screen for class membership. (See Part V.B.3., above, for non-class member processing instructions.)

  • If the 120-day retention period for holding a claim file after an ALJ decision or Appeals Council action has expired, OAO will attach a Prue/Weathers class member flag (see Attachment 9) to the outside of the file and send the claim file(s) to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) for review of the Prue/Weathers class member claim.

  • If less than 120 days have elapsed, OAO will attach a Prue/Weathers class member flag (see Attachment 10) to the outside of the file to ensure that the case is routed to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) after expiration of the retention period. Pending expiration of the retention period, OAO will also:

    • return unappealed ALJ decisions and dismissals to DFB, OAO; and

    • return unappealed Appeals Council denials to the appropriate OAO minidocket.

The respective OAO components will monitor the retention period and, if the claimant does not seek further administrative or judicial review, route the file(s) to the District of Columbia DDS (or the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) in a timely manner.

D. Processing and Adjudicating Class Member Claims in Conjunction with Current Claims (Consolidation Procedures)

  1. General

    If a class member has a current claim pending at any administrative level and consolidation is warranted according to the guidelines below, the appropriate component will consolidate all Prue/Weathers class member claims with the current claim at the level at which the current claim is pending.

  2. Current Claim Pending in the Hearing Office

    1. Hearing Scheduled or Held and all Remand Cases

      Except as noted below, if a Prue/Weathers class member has a request for hearing pending on a current claim, and the ALJ has either scheduled or held a hearing, and in all remand cases, the ALJ will consolidate the Prue/Weathers case with the appeal on the current claim.

      EXCEPTIONS:

      The ALJ will not consolidate the claims if

      • the current claim and the Prue/Weathers claim do not have any issues in common; or

      • a court remand contains a court-ordered time limit and it will not be possible to meet the time limit if the claims are consolidated.

      If the claims are consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.c. below. If the claims are not consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.d. below.

    2. Hearing Not Scheduled

      Except as noted below, if a Prue/Weathers class member has an initial request for hearing pending on a current claim and the HO has not yet scheduled a hearing, the ALJ will not consolidate the Prue/Weathers claim and the current claim. Instead, the ALJ will dismiss the request for hearing on the current claim and forward both the Prue/Weathers claim and the current claim to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) for further action (see Part VI.D.2.d. below).

      EXCEPTION:

      If the hearing has not been scheduled because the claimant waived the right to an in-person hearing, and the ALJ is prepared to issue a fully favorable decision on the current claim, and this decision would also be fully favorable with respect to all issues raised by the application that makes the claimant a Prue/Weathers class member, the ALJ will consolidate the claims.

      If the claims are consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.c. below. If the claims are not consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.d. below.

    3. Action if Claims Are Consolidated

      If the ALJ decides to consolidate the current claim with the Prue/Weathers claim(s), the HO will:

      • give proper notice of any new issue(s) as required by 20 CFR §§ 404.946(b) and 416.1446(b), if the Prue/Weathers claim raises an additional issue(s) not raised by the current claim;

      • offer the claimant a supplemental hearing if the ALJ already has held a hearing and the Prue/Weathers claim raises an additional issue(s), unless the ALJ is prepared to issue a fully favorable decision with respect to the Prue/Weathers claim; and

      • issue one decision that addresses both the issues raised by the current request for hearing and those raised by the Prue/Weathers claim (the ALJ's decision will clearly indicate that the ALJ considered the Prue/Weathers claim pursuant to the Prue/Weathers Stipulation and Order).

    4. Action if Claims Not Consolidated

      If common issues exist but the ALJ decides not to consolidate the current claim with the Prue/Weathers claim because a hearing has not yet been scheduled, the ALJ will:

      • dismiss, without prejudice, the request for hearing on the current claim, using the language in Attachment 11 and the covering notice in Attachment 12; and

      • send both the Prue/Weathers claim and the current claim to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) for DDS consolidation and further action.

    If the ALJ decides not to consolidate the Prue/Weathers claim with the current claim because: 1) the claims do not have any issues in common; or 2) there is a court-ordered time limit, the ALJ will:

    • flag the Prue/Weathers claim for DDS review using Attachment 13; immediately route it to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) for readjudication; and retain a copy of Attachment 13 in the current claim file; and

    • take the necessary action to complete the record and issue a decision on the current claim.

  3. Current Claim Pending at the Appeals Council

    The action the Appeals Council takes on the current claim dictates the disposition of the Prue/Weathers claim. Therefore, OAO must keep the claim folders together until the Appeals Council completes its action on the subsequent claim. The following sections identify the possible Appeals Council actions on the current claim and the appropriate corresponding action on the Prue/Weathers claim.

    1. Appeals Council Intends to Dismiss, Deny Review or Issue a Denial Decision on the Current Claim — No Prue/Weathers Issue(s) Will Remain Unresolved

      This will usually arise when the current claim duplicates the Prue/Weathers review claim, i.e., the current claim raises the issue of disability and covers the entire period adjudicated in the Prue/Weathers claim, and the current claim has been adjudicated in accordance with the provisions of SSR 85-28 and the current severity regulations, i.e., 20 CFR §§ 404.1520(c), 404.1521, 404.1523, 416.920(c), 416.921 and/or 416.923. In this instance, the Appeals Council will consolidate the claims and proceed with its intended action.

      The Appeals Council's order, decision or notice of action will clearly indicate that the ALJ's or Appeals Council's action resolved or resolves both the current claim and the Prue/Weathers claim.

    2. Appeals Council Intends To Dismiss, Deny Review or Issue a Denial Decision on the Current Claim — Prue/Weathers Issue(s) Will Remain Unresolved

      This will usually arise when the current claim does not duplicate the Prue/Weathers claim, e.g., the current claim raises the issue of disability but does not cover the entire period adjudicated in the Prue/Weathers claim. For example, the Prue/Weathers claim raises the issue of disability for a period prior to the period adjudicated in the current claim. In this instance, the Appeals Council will proceed with its intended action on the current claim.

      OAO staff will attach a Prue/Weathers case flag (Attachment 9) to the Prue/Weathers claim, immediately forward the Prue/Weathers claim to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) for adjudication, and retain a copy of Attachment 9 in the current claim file. OAO will modify Attachment 9 to indicate that the Appeals Council action on the current claim does not resolve all Prue/Weathers issues and that the Prue/Weathers class member claim is being forwarded for separate processing. OAO staff will include copies of the ALJ's or Appeals Council's decision or order or notice of denial of request for review on the current claim and the exhibit list used for the ALJ's or Appeals Council's decision.

    3. Appeals Council Intends To Issue a Favorable Decision on the Current Claim — No Prue/Weathers Issue(s) Will Remain Unresolved

      If the Appeals Council intends to issue a fully favorable decision on a current claim, and this decision would be fully favorable with respect to all issues raised by the application that makes the claimant a Prue/Weathers class member, the Appeals Council will proceed with its intended action. In this instance, the Appeals Council will consolidate the claims, reopen the final determination or decision on the Prue/Weathers claim, and issue a decision that adjudicates both applications.

      The Appeals Council's decision will indicate clearly that the Appeals Council considered the Prue/Weathers claim pursuant to the Prue/Weathers Stipulation and Order.

    4. Appeals Council Intends To Issue a Favorable Decision on the Current Claim — Prue/Weathers Issue(s) Will Remain Unresolved

      If the Appeals Council intends to issue a favorable decision on a current claim and this decision would not be fully favorable with respect to all issues raised by the Prue/Weathers claim, the Appeals Council will proceed with its intended action. In this situation, the Appeals Council will request the effectuating component to forward the claim files to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) after the Appeals Council's decision is effectuated.

      OAO staff will include the following language on the transmittal sheet used to forward the case for effectuation: “Prue/Weathers court case review needed — following effectuation forward the attached combined files to the District of Columbia Disability Determination Service [address] (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies).”

    5. Appeals Council Intends To Remand the Current Claim to an ALJ

      If the Appeals Council intends to remand the current claim to an ALJ, it will proceed with its intended action unless one of the exceptions below applies. In its remand order, the Appeals Council will direct the ALJ to consolidate the Prue/Weathers claim with the action on the current claim pursuant to the instructions in Part VI.D.2.a. above.

    EXCEPTIONS:

    The Appeals Council will not direct the ALJ to consolidate the claim if

    • the current claim and the Prue/Weathers claim do not have any issues in common; or

    • a court remand contains a court-ordered time limit and it will not be possible to meet the time limit if the claims are consolidated.

    If the claims do not share a common issue or a court-ordered time limit makes consolidation impractical, OAO will forward the Prue/Weathers class member claim to the District of Columbia DDS (or to the appropriate DDS if the exception in Part III. above applies) for separate review. The case flag in Attachment 9 should be modified to indicate that the Appeals Council, rather than an ALJ, is forwarding the Prue/Weathers class member claim for separate processing.

VII. Case Coding

HO personnel will code prior claims into the Hearing Office Tracking System (HOTS) and the OHA Case Control System (OHA CCS) as “reopenings.” If the prior claim is consolidated with a current claim already pending at the hearing level (see Part VI. above), HO personnel will not code the prior claim as a separate hearing request. Instead, HO personnel will change the hearing type on the current claim to a “reopening.” If the conditions described in Part VI.E.2.c. above apply, the ALJ should dismiss the request for rehearing on the current claim, and HO personnel should enter “OTDI” in the “DSP” field.

To identify class member cases in HOTS, HO personnel will code “WE” in the “Class Action” field. No special identification codes will be used in the OHA CCS.

VIII. Reconciliation of Implementation

At an appropriate time, Litigation Staff will request SSA components to reconcile their screening activity and disposition of class member claims with information available on CATS. Within OHA, the OAO Class Action Coordinator is responsible for maintaining a personal computer-based record of OHA implementation activity (e.g., a record of alerts processed by OHA, and a record of cases screened and consolidated by OHA), as reported by HOs and OAO to the Coordinator. See Part V.B.2.a. and HALLEX I-1-7-12 with respect to the reporting requirements.

IX. Inquiries

HO personnel should direct any questions to their Regional Office. Regional Office personnel should contact the Division of Field Practices and Procedures in the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge at (703) 305-0022.

Attachment 1. Prue/Weathers v. Sullivan Stipulation and Order; Approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and Filed July 23, 1993.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos. 84-3035 and 84-3870 (TPJ)
[filed July 23, 1993]

LILIA M. WEATHERS,
JESSIE PRUE, Plaintiffs,

v.

LOUIS W. Sullivan, M.D.,
Secretary of Health and
Human Services, Defendant.

STIPULATION AND ORDER

IT IS STIPULATED by plaintiffs and defendant, through their respective counsel, that the following terms are agreed to in full settlement of the above-captioned civil action.

  1. Pursuant to this Stipulation and Order, the individual appeals of Lilia M. Weathers and Jessie Prue, which were dismissed, shall be reviewed by the District Court in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

  2. Pursuant to this Stipulation and Order, the class entitled to relief now consists of:

    all persons who resided in the District of Columbia between July 28, 1984 and March 4, 1985, inclusive', and who were issued a decision which became final at any level of the administrative appears process, denying or terminating disability insurance benefits or Social Security income payments under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seg. based upon a finding that they did not have a severe impairment(s).

  3. The Social Security Administration (SSA) shall, by means of it's data processing systems, commence identification of the names, Social Security numbers and last known addresses of all potential class members. SSA shall make good faith efforts to complete such identification within 120 days of the date of entry of this Stipulation and Order.

  4. Within 150 days of entry of this Order, SSA will issue instructions to SSA adjudicators for screening potential class members claims and for reviewing the claims of class members. SSA will simultaneously provide copies of all instructions and directives to class counsel.

  5. Upon completion of the identification procedure described in paragraph 3, and within 60 days of the issuance of instructions in paragraph 4, SSA shall send a notice by first class mail to each potential class member so identified at his/her last known address. A copy of the notice is attached to this Stipulation and Order. The notice will advise potential class members of possible entitlement to a redetermination of their claims and will further state that the potential class member must return the pre-addressed postage-paid envelope and accompanying response form within 60 days from the date of receipt of the notice in order to receive consideration for relief.

  6. If a person who receives a notice pursuant to paragraph 4 requests review more than 60 days after receiving such notice, the Secretary shall determine whether that person has “good cause” for the late request, as defined in 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.911, 416.1411. The time in which a potential class member must respond to the notice shall begin to run upon receipt of the notice by the potential class member. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.901, 416.1401.

  7. For those individuals who timely respond to the notice described in paragraph 4 above, SSA will screen the applicable claims folders or other relevant records to determine if they are class members. Those individuals who have been determined not to be class members will be notified in writing of such determination and will be further informed of their right to request a review of their administrative record in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraphs 8 through 11.

  8. Individuals who disagree with a finding that they do not meet the class membership criteria may contact or write class counsel. Class counsel may, within 60 days of the date of the class determination notice, notify in writing the Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Division, Social Security Administration, Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235, that they wish to review the individual claim file. Within 30 days of class counsel's written request to review the file, SSA will make available that individual's claim file or other relevant documents on which the class membership decision was based at a designated SSA field office in Washington, D.C. or other mutually acceptable location, and will notify class counsel in writing. A staff person within the Office of the General Counsel, shall be designated to facilitate the resolution of the class membership disputes and the name and telephone number of that person shall be provided to class counsel. Class counsel must reviewed files within 30 days of the date the files are made available to them.

    If, at the expiration of the 30 days, class counsel have not reviewed the file, it shall be assumed that review is no longer desired and SSA's non-class membership determination shall become final and not subject to further review.

  9. If class counsel's review of the file establishes that there is a dispute as to whether the individual is a class member, class counsel will again notify the Office of the General Counsel. Both parties will then attempt to resolve the dispute. In the event the parties are unable to settle the dispute, class counsel may submit any unresolved dispute to the Court for final resolution by proper motion made within 30 days of the date of written notice, by the Office of the General Counsel. Failure of class counsel to request a judicial determination within the aforesaid 30 day period shall render SSA's non-class membership determination final and not subject to further review,

  10. The Social Security Administration will not review the claim of any potential class member who:

    1. appealed the administrative determination resulting in class membership which:

      1. culminated in a subsequent administrative determination after March 4, 1985;

      2. culminated in a subsequent administrative determination on or before March 4, 1985, if the determination was not based upon a finding of a not severe impairment; or

      3. was affirmed by a federal court at any time or;

    2. was issued an administrative or judicial determination on a subsequent application which covered the entire period at issue in the individual's claim covered by this action.

  11. The claim of class members shall be predetermined to ensure that the decision upon which class membership is based was correct based on the evidence of record. The Secretary shall redertimine the applications of all persons found to be class members using the Secretary's present severity regulations. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(c), 416.920(c). Where, upon such review, an individual's impairments are considered to have been severe (either individually or in combination), the Secretary shall evaluate the individual's claim in accordance with the sequential evaluation process set forth at 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520, 416.920 (1991). The claims of all class members shall be redetermined at the reconsideration stage of the administrative process. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.907-913a, 416.1404-1413a. The Secretary will consider new evidence, but only as it pertains to the period covered by the decision rendered during the time period at issue in the instant case. For consideration of a disability beginning subsequent to the decision upon which class membership is based, class members are required to have filed a new application. All class members who requested redetermination will receive notices informing them of the decision made concerning their claims following redetermination. Class members shall retain all rights to administrative and judicial review of decisions made as a consequence of this order.

  12. At the option of SSA, class members with subsequent disability claims, active and simultaneously pending at my administrative level of review at the time the class claim is being evaluated, may have all other claims consolidated with the class Claim and reviewed simultaneously.

  13. Class members having individual actions pending in Federal court challenging the unfavorable administrative decision resulting in class membership may elect either to have their claims remanded to the Secretary for redetermination pursuant to paragraph 11 of this Stipulation and Order or to have the action proceed in Federal court pursuant to, and subject to, the limitations contained in 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A class member opting to continue his civil litigation in Federal court waives his rights under this Stipulation and Order.

  14. The claims of individuals determined to be class member will be reviewed and, if determined to be eligible, class member will be paid from:

    1. the sixth month following the date of established onset of disability, or 12 months prior to this date of filing, whichever is later, in cases where benefits under title II were denied;

    2. the date of application, in cases where benefits under title XVI were denied; or

    3. the date of the termination of benefits.

  15. SSA will monitor the implementation of this Order and will provide to class counsel, on a quarterly basis, reports containing the following information:

    1. the number of persons notified initially of potential class membership;

    2. the number of persons who responded to the notice;

    3. the number of persons responding who were determined not to be class members;

    4. the number of persons responding determined to be class members

    5. the number of class members found eligible for disability benefits upon readjudication by the District of Columbia Department of Human Resources, Disability Determination division (DDD);

    6. the number of class members whose applications were denied upon readjudication by the DDD.

    Upon agreement between the parties, this reporting requirement may be altered or amended.

  16. The parties may, by written agreement, alter any time period specified in this Stipulation and Order. Such agreements need not be filed with the court, unless either party deems it appropriate to do so.

  17. If either party seeks judicial resolution any dispute arising under this Stipulation and Order, the time limits set forth in this Stipulation and Order which are affected thereby will be suspended, and will begin running anew only following resolution of the issue by the court.

  18. Within 30 days of the approval of this stipulation and order by the Court, SSA shall make good faith efforts to pay to class counsel attorney fees in the amount of $35,000.00 in full and final settlement of any and all claims in this action for attorney fees, expenses or costs pursuant to any statute or other basis for services that have been performed.

  19. With respect to this action, the court shall retain jurisdiction only over matters relating to compliance with terms of this Stipulation and Order and previous orders of this Court.

  20. This Stipulation and Order is not and shall not be construed as an admission by the Secretary of the truth of any allegations or the validity of any claim asserted in this action or of defendant's liability therein, nor is it a concession or an admission of any fault or omission in any act or failure to act, or any statement, written document or report heretofore issued, filed, or made by any Secretary nor shall this Stipulation and Order nor any papers related hereto, nor any of the terms hereof be offered or received in evidence or in any way referred to in any civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding other than such proceedings as may be necessary to consummate or enforce this Stipulation and Order, nor shall they be construed by anyone for any purpose whatsoever as an admission of any wrongdoing on the part of defendant.

  21. The terms set forth in this Stipulation and Order shall be in full settlement and satisfaction of any and all claims and demands, of whatever nature, the plaintiffs had or may hereafter acquire against the defendant, and any of his agencies, agents, employees, or instrumentalities on account of and with respect to the incidents, claims or circumstances giving rise to and/or alleged in the pleadings filed herein.

  22. The undersigned plaintiffs' counsel hereby represent, warrant, and guarantee that they are duly authorized to execute this Stipulation and Order on behalf of the plaintiffs and all of the members of the class they represent, and all counsel for individual plaintiffs. The Secretary's counsel, by signing below, represent that they are authorized to stipulate to the settlement of issues in this action.

  23. This Stipulation and Order shall be effective only upon entry of the order by the court.

Respecctfully submitted,

/s/

Michael Schuster, Bar 934133
Legal Counsel for the Elderly
601 E Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20049

/s/

Gay Gellhorn,
District of Columbia School of Law
719 13th St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
/s/

Peter Meyers
George Washington University
Community Legal Clinic
720 20th St., N.W. Suite 101
Washington, D.C. 20052
/s/

Jay B. Stwvens, D.C. Bar #177840
United States Attorney

John D. Bates, D.C. Bar #934927
Assistant United States Attorney
/s/

Claire Whiteker, D.C. Bar #354530
Assistant United States Attorney
Judiciary Center Building
555 4th St., N.W. Room 4211
Washington, D.C. 20001

/s/

So ordered: Dated: 7/23/93 Honorable Thomas P. Jackson United States District Judge

Attachment 2 -. PRUE/WEATHERS COURT CASE FLAG/ALERT

                    TITLE:       CATEGORY:

      REVIEW OFFICE    PSC    MFT    DOC      ALERT DATE

      BOAN OR PAN     NAME

              CAN OR HUN        RESP DTETOE

   FOLDER LOCATION INFORMATION
TITLE  CFL   CFL DATE    ACN         PAYEE ADDRESS

   SCREENING OFFICE ADDRESS:

   Office of Disability and International Operations
   P.O. Box 17369
   Baltimore, MD 21298-0050

           OR

   Appropriate DDS

   ATTN: Prue/Weathers Screening Unit

   IF CLAIM IS PENDING OR STORED IN OHA, THEN SHIP TO:

   Office of Hearings and Appeals
   Office of Appellate Operations (OAO)
   One Skyline Tower, Suite 701
   5107 Leesburg Pike
   Falls Church, VA 22041-3200

   ATTN: OAO Class Action Coordinator

   (Case locator code 5007)

Attachment 3. Prue/Weathers Class Action Case

SCREENING NECESSARY

Claimant's Name: __________________________________

SSN: __________________________________

This claimant may be a Prue/Weathers class member. The attached folder location information indicates that a current claim file is pending in your office. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached alert [and prior claim file(s)] for association, screening for class membership, consolidation consideration and possible readjudication.

Please refer to HALLEX TI 5-4-19 for additional information and instructions.

TO: __________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________

Attachment 4. PRUE/WEATHERS SCREENING SHEET

1. CLASS ACTION CODE: W E  

2. WAGE EARNER'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ___

BIC

___ ___

3. CLAIMANT'S NAME (FIRST, MI, LAST)

4. SCREENING DATE (MONTH, DAY, YEAR)

___ ___ - ___ ___- ___ ___

5. a. SCREENING RESULT

[____] MEMBER (J) [____] NONMEMBER (F)

b. SCREENOUT CODE

[____] [____]

(see Item 13 for screenout codes)

6. Is this a DIB, CDB claim or a SSID adult claim?

___ Yes ____ No

(if No, go to 13)

7. Did the claimant reside in the District of Columbia and receive a title II or title XVI less than fully favorable determination/decision or termination at any administrative level between July 28, 1984, and March 4, 1985, inclusive?

___ Yes ____ No

(if No, go to 13)

8. Did this determination/decision become the final decision of the Secretary? (Note: Although not the “final decision of the Secretary,” an Appeals Council denial of a request for review is the last action of the Secretary, and the date of such a denial controls for class membership screening purposes.)

___ Yes ____ No

(if No, go to 13)

9. Was the determination/decision made on the basis of a finding of a “not severe” impairment(s)?

___ Yes ____ No

(if No, go to 13)

10. Was the administrative decision affirmed by a Federal Court at any time?

___ Yes ____ No

(if Yes, go to 13)

11. Did the claimant receive a subsequent fully favorable determination/decision which established entitlement and paid benefits commencing with the earliest possible month of entitlement in the potential Prue/Weathers claim (i.e., based on the earliest alleged onset date?)

___ Yes ____ No

(if Yes, go to 13)

12. Did the claimant receive an administrative or judicial decision, either favorable or unfavorable, after March 4, 1985, on a subsequent claim which covered the entire timeframe at issue in the potential Prue/Weathers claim?

___ Yes ____ No

(if Yes, go to 13)

13.The claimant is not a Prue/Weathers class member.

Check the nonmember block in item 5.a. and enter the screenout code in item 5.b. as follows:

Enter 06 if question 6 was answered “NO.”

Enter 07 if question 7 was answered “NO”

Enter 08 if question 8 was answered “NO.”

Enter 09 if question 9 was answered “NO.”

Enter 10 if question 10 was answered “YES.”

Enter 11 if question 11 was answered “YES.”

Enter 12 if question 12 was answered “YES.”

 

 

No other screenout code entry is appropriate.

After completing 5.b. check the appropriate box in 5.a.

ENTER SCREENER'S NAME:

SIGNATURE:

SCREENING COMPONENT CODE AND PHONE NO.

DATE

Enter dates of all applications screened and the date of the final determination/decision for each application.

__________ __________ __________ __________

Attachment 5. Route Slip for Routing Court Case Alert (and Prior Claim Files)—OHA No Longer Has Current Claims

ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE:
TO: INITIALS DATE
1.    
2.    
3.    
4.    
5.    
6.    
7.    
XX ACTION   FILE   NOTE AND RETURN
  APPROVAL   FOR CLEARANCE   PER CONVERSATION
  AS REQUESTED   FOR CORRECTION   PREPARE REPLY
  CIRCULATE   FOR YOUR INFORMATION   SEE ME
  COMMENT   INVESTIGATE   SIGNATURE
  COORDINATION   JUSTIFY    

REMARKS

PRUE/WEATHERS CASE

Claimant: ___________________________

SSN: ________________________________

OHA received the attached alert [and prior claim file(s)] for screening and no longer has the current claim file. Our records show that you now have possession of the current claim. Accordingly, we are forwarding the alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) for association with the current claim. After associating the alert with the current claim, please forward to ODIO or to the DDS, if appropriate, for screening. SEE POMS DI 12530.001 ff., DI 32530.001 ff., OR DI 42530.001 ff.

Attachment

DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals,
clearances, and similar actions.

FROM:

Office of Hearings and Appeals

__________________________________________

SUITE/BUILDING
PHONE NUMBER

OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
*U.S.GPO:1985-0-461-274/20020 Prescribed by GSA
FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.206

Attachment 6. Non-Class Membership Notice

SOCIAL

SECURITY Important Information

NOTICE

_____________________________________________________________

From: Department of Health and Human Services

Social Security Administration

_____________________________________________________________

___________________________ DATE: __________________

___________________________ CLAIM NUMBER: __________________

___________________________ DOC: ___________________________

We are writing to tell you that we received your request to review your earlier claim for disability benefits under the Prue/Weathers settlement agreement. We have looked at your case and have decided that you are not a class member. This means that we will not review our earlier decision that you were not disabled.

Why You Are Not a Class Member

You are not a Prue/Weathers class member because:

[ ] You never filed a claim for disability benefits or Supplemental Security Income benefits.
[ ] You did not reside in the District of Columbia at any time between July 28, 1984, and March 4, 1985, inclusive.
[ ] Your claim for disability benefits was not denied or ceased at any administrative level between July 28, 1984, and March 4, 1985, inclusive.
[ ] You received a less than fully favorable or termination decision from Social Security between July 28, 1984, and March 4, 1985, inclusive, but it was not based on a finding of “no severe” impairment(s).
[ ] Your case was decided by a Federal court.
[ ] You received a fully favorable decision based on your earliest onset date and you were fully paid.
[ ] You received a decision on a later claim, which covered the entire timeframe at issue in the potential Prue/Weathers claim.
[ ] Your benefits were denied or terminated for a reason other than your medical condition. The reason was:

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

[ ] Other (Explain) _____________________________________

If you disagree with our decision, you should call or write class counsel, who will answer your questions about class membership. Class counsel have only 60 days from the date you receive this notice to let Social Security know you disagree with our reason as to why you are not a class member. You may contact the Prue/Weathers class counsel by calling (202) 434-2170. Class counsel will answer your questions about class membership without charge. The names and addresses of class counsel are:

Gay Gellhorn
District of Columbia Schoool of Law
Public Entitlements Clinic
719 13th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Michael Schuster
Legal Counsel for the Elderly
601 E Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20049
Peter Meyers
George Washington University
Community Legal Clinic
720 20th Street, N.W. SL 101
Washington, D.C. 20052

We Are Not Deciding If You Are Disabled

It is important for you to know that we are not making a decision about whether you are currently disabled. We are deciding only that you are not a Prue/Weathers class member.

If You Are Disabled Now

If you think you are disabled now, you should fill out a new application at any Social Security Office. A new application, however, is not the same as receiving a review of your prior claim. Class counsel can give you further advice.

If You Have Any Questions

If you have any questions, you may contact class counsel or your local Social Security Office. Most questions can be answered by telephone. The address and telephone number are printed at the top of this letter. If you call or visit Social Security, please have this letter with you. It will help us answer your questions.

Si usted no entiende esta carta, llevela a la oficina de Seguro Social arriba mencionada para que se la expliquen.

cc: Michael Schuster
Washington, D.C. 20049
(Representative, if any)

Attachment 7. Route Slip for Non-Class Membership Cases

ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE:
TO: INITIALS DATE
1. SSA District Office    
2. 2100 M Street, N.W.    
3. Washington, D.C. 20203    
4.    
5. [or other mutually acceptable location]    
6.    
7.    

XX ACTION   FILE   NOTE AND RETURN
  APPROVAL   FOR CLEARANCE   PER CONVERSATION
  AS REQUESTED   FOR CORRECTION   PREPARE REPLY
  CIRCULATE   FOR YOUR INFORMATION   SEE ME
  COMMENT   INVESTIGATE   SIGNATURE
  COORDINATION   JUSTIFY    

REMARKS

PRUE/WEATHERS

Claimant: ___________________________

SSN: ________________________________

We have determined that this claimant is not a Prue/Weathers class member. (See screening sheet and copy of non-class membership notice in the attached claim folder(s).) Class Counsel has timely requested to review this determination and the attached claim folder(s). SEE POMS DI 12530.001 ff.

Attachment

DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals,
clearances, and similar actions.

FROM:

Office of Hearings and Appeals

__________________________________________

SUITE/BUILDING
PHONE NUMBER

OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
*U.S.GPO:1985-0-461-274/20020 Prescribed by GSA
FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.206

Attachment 8. Acting Associate Commissioner's Memorandum Dated February 21, 1991, Entitled “The Standard for Evaluating 'Not Severe' Impairments.”

 

Social Security Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

Refer to: FEB 21, 1991

Office of Hearings and Appeals
PO Box 3200
Arlington VA 22203

MEMORANDUM TO:

Headquarters Executive Staff

Appeals Council Members

Regional Chief Administrative Law Judges

Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judges

Administrative Law Judges

Supervisory Staff Attorneys

Decision Writers

FROM:

Acting Associate Commissioner

SUBJECT:

The Standard for Evaluating “Not Severe” Impairments — ACTION

During the past few months, the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has requested voluntary remand in a number of cases, denied by the Secretary at step two of the sequential evaluation, on the grounds that the decisions have not been fully consistent with SSA policy and the Supreme Courts opinion in Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137 (1987).

Despite the Yuckert decision, extensive litigation, both in individual cases and in significant class actions, continues on the issue of how the Agency applies the step two standard expressed in Social Security Ruling (SSR) 85-28. Because the courts continue to give step two denials close scrutiny, I am asking all adjudicators and decision writers to carefully review SSR 85-28 to ensure that they are applying the proper standard for adjudicating claims at step two.

In accordance with SSR 85-28, a step two denial is appropriate only in very limited situations. The evidence must establish that the claimants impairment, or combination of impairments, is so slight that it does not have more than a minimal effect on the individual's ability to perform basic work activities. When the medical evidence is inconclusive and does not clearly establish the effect of a claimant impairment(s), or when the evidence shows more than a minimal effect, the claim may not be denied at step two.

Decisions denying claims at step two must include a comprehensive analysis of all the evidence of record and a decisional rationale consistent with SSR 85-28. Even when the medical evidence of record clearly fails to establish that the claimant has more than a slight mental or physical abnormality, the decision must clearly show that the adjudicator evaluated all the evidence and must articulate the reasons for finding that the impairment(s) is not severe. Furthermore, when the claimant has a medically determinable impairment(s) which might reasonably be expected to cause pain the decision must include an evaluation of the claimant's subjective complaints using the factors outlined in SSR 88-13 or its equivalent, i.e., SSR 90-1p for Circuit cases.

If hearing office personnel have questions or need copies of applicable instructions, they should contact the appropriate Regional Office. Regional Office personnel should direct their questions to the Division of Field Practices and Procedures, Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge.

Lawrence W. Mason for Andrew J. Young

Attachment 9. Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication — retention period expired)

Prue/Weathers Class Action Case

READJUDICATION NECESSARY

Claimant's Name: __________________________________

SSN : __________________________________

This claimant is a Prue/Weathers class member. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached claim file(s) to the DDS for readjudication.

Send file(s) to:

Department of Human Resources/Vocational Rehabilitation Administration
Disability Determination Division
P.O. Box 37608
Washington, D.C. 20013

(Destination code: ____ )

NOTE:

If a face-to-face is required, i.e., cessation or terminal illness (TERI) case, the claim file must be sent to the “resident” DDS (see Part III. of the TI).

Attachment 10. Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication — retention period was not expired)

Prue/Weathers Class Action Case

READJUDICATION NECESSARY

Claimant's Name: __________________________________

SSN : __________________________________

This claimant is a Prue/Weathers class member. After expiration of the retention period, forward claim file(s) to the DDS for readjudication.

Send the file(s) to:

Department of Human Resources/Vocational
Rehabilitation Administration
Disability Determination Division
P.O. Box 37608
Washington, D.C. 20013

(Destination code: ____ )

NOTE:

If the claimant has filed a civil action and elected to remain in court for review of the current claim, forward the Prue/Weathers claim file(s) without delay to the DDS for readjudication.

If a face-to-face review is required, i.e., cessation or terminal illness (TERI) case, the claim file must be sent to the “resident” DDS (see Part III. of the TI).

Attachment 11. ALJ Dismissal to DDS

DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Social Security Administration
OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

IN THE CASE OF

CLAIM FOR

__________________________

__________________________

__________________________

__________________________

This case is before the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to a request for hearing filed on _________________ with respect to the application(s) filed on _________________.

In accordance with the Stipulation and Order negotiated by the parties and approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the case of Prue/Weathers, et al. v. Sullivan, Nos. 84-3035 and 84-3870 (D.D.C. July 23, 1993), the claimant has requested a redetermination of the final (determination/decision) on the prior application(s) filed on ______________. The claimant has been identified as a Prue/Weathers class member and is entitled to have the final administrative denial of the prior application(s) reviewed under the terms of the Prue/Weathers Stipulation and Order. Because the claimant's current claim shares certain issues in common with the prior claim, the undersigned hereby dismisses without prejudice the request for hearing.

The claimant's current application(s) will be associated with the prior claim(s) and forwarded to the District of Columbia Disability Determination Service [or the “resident” DDS, if appropriate] which will conduct the Prue/Weathers redetermination.

The Disability Determination Service will notify the claimant of its new determination and of the claimant's right to file a new request for hearing.

_________________________

Administrative Law Judge

_________________________

Date

Attachment 12. Notice Transmitting ALJ Order of Dismissal

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Claimant's Name
Address
City, State Zip

Enclosed is an order of the Administrative Law Judge dismissing your request for hearing and returning your case to the District of Columbia Disability Determination Service [or the “resident” DDS, if appropriate] which makes disability determinations for the Social Security Administration. Please read this notice and Order of Dismissal carefully.

What This Order Means

The Administrative Law Judge has sent your current claim and your Prue/Weathers class member claim back to the District of Columbia Disability Determination Service [or the “resident” DDS, if appropriate] for further processing. The enclosed order explains why.

The Next Action on Your Claim

The District of Columbia Disability Determination Service will contact you to tell you what you need to do. If you do not hear from the District of Columbia Disability Determination Service [or the “resident” DDS, if appropriate] within 30 days, contact your local Social Security Office.

Do You Have Any Questions?

If you have any questions, contact your local Social Security Office. If you visit your local Social Security Office, please bring this notice and the Administrative Law Judge's order with you.

Enclosure

cc: (Name and address of representative, if any)
(Social Security Office (City, State))

Attachment 13. Class Member Flag for HO Use (DDS Readjudication)

Prue/Weathers Class Action Case

READJUDICATION NECESSARY

Claimant's Name: __________________________________

SSN: __________________________________

This claimant is a Prue/Weathers class member. The attached Prue/Weathers claim file was forwarded to this hearing office for possible consolidation with a current claim.

_______

The Administrative Law Judge has determined that the prior and current claims do not share a common issue and, therefore, should not be consolidated.

OR

_______

The claims have not been consolidated because:

[state reason(s)]

____________________________________________

Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached alert and prior claim file(s) to your location for any necessary Prue/Weathers readjudication action.

We are sending the alert and prior folder(s) to:

Department of Human Resources/Vocational
Rehabilitation Administration
Disability Determination Division
P.O. Box 37608
Washington, D.C. 20013

(Destination code: ____)

NOTE:

If a face-to-face review is required, i.e., cessation or terminal illness (TERI) case, the claim file must be sent to the “resident” DDS (see Part III. of the TI).