EFFECTIVE/PUBLICATION DATE: 09/08/92
Purpose: This Ruling defines a loan for SSI purposes. It also explains when the proceeds of a loan count as resources under the SSI program, when they do not count as income, and how SSA treats a loan agreement when the lender is an SSI applicant or recipient. Social Security Ruling (SSR) 78-26 previously addressed these issues.
In addition, this Ruling reinterprets SSI regulations to permit treating, as the basis for a loan, food or shelter that an SSI applicant or recipient receives from someone in whose household he or she lives and has an obligation to pay for at a future date.
This Ruling supersedes SSR 78-26.
Citations (authority): Sections 1611 and 1631(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act, as amended; Regulations No. 16, Subpart K, sections 416.1103(f) and 416.1133(a).
Background: The Social Security Act, at section 1612(a)(2)(A), provides that unearned income includes in-kind support and maintenance. Regulations, at 20 CFR 416.1121(h), define in-kind support and maintenance as food, clothing, and shelter furnished to an SSI applicant or recipient. Regulations, at 20 CFR 416.1103(f), provide that the proceeds of a loan are not income.
In 1978, the Social Security Administration (SSA) published SSR 78-26, setting forth its policy regarding the treatment of loans under the SSI program. SSR 78-26 gave the following information:
Under this policy interpretation, a householder's advance of food or shelter to a household member could not be treated as a loan because it did not involve an actual advance of cash.
In 1986, in Hickman v. Bowen (803 F.2d 1377), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that there was no jurisdiction for treating cash and in-kind income differently under 20 CFR 416.1103(f). Since both are income, both could be the subject of a loan. The court concluded that food or shelter provided by a householder to a household member is a loan if the household member is obligated to repay the debt.
In 1988, SSA issued Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 88-7(5) to implement the Hickman decision for individuals residing in the States in the Fifth Circuit (Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas). AR 88-7(5) instructed that when an SSI claimant or recipient alleges receiving in-kind support and maintenance, that in-kind support and maintenance will be considered a loan and its value will not be considered for the purpose of calculating SSI benefits, but only if the applicant or recipient can demonstrate that the in-kind support and maintenance receive was, in fact, loaned to him or her in realistic anticipation of repayment, that he or she intends to repay the debt, and that under the terms of SSR 78-26 a bona fide loan agreement has been made.
In 1991, in Cequerra v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (933 F.2d 735), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion which adopted the rationale of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Hickman. Absent a change in national policy, SSA acquiescence policy would thus require the issuance of another acquiescence ruling similar to AR 88-7(5) for individual residing in the Ninth Circuit (Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon, and Washington).
In view of these recent court decisions, SSA has decided to reinterpret its regulations on the treatment in the SSI program of advances of food and shelter to an SSI or recipient by an individual in whose household he or she is residing.
Policy Interpretation: For purposes of determining when a loan is not considered income and when a loan is considered a countable resource under the SSI program, the following policies apply:
Documentation: Evidence must be obtained with respect to the existence of a bona fide loan agreement. The burden of proof with respect to the bona fide nature of the loan is with the applicant or recipient.
Effective Date: The effective date of this Ruling is the date of its publication in the Federal Register. Determinations made before that date regarding advances of food or shelter may be reopened and revised subject to the rules of administrative finality at 20 CFR 416.1488(a).
The AR for the Hickman decision (AR 88-7(5)), is being rescinded through a separate publication in the Federal Register. However, anyone to whom the Hickman AR would have applied, had it remained in effect, may request application of the policy contained in this Ruling to determinations made by SSA between the date of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision (November 10, 1986) and the date this Ruling is published in the Federal Register if he or she first demonstrates that application of this Ruling could change the prior determination or decision. In addition, anyone to whom a Cequerra AR would have applied, had one been issued, may request application of this Ruling to determinations made by SSA between the date of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision (May 15, 1991) and the date this ruling is published in the Federal Register if he or she first demonstrates that application of this Ruling could change the prior determination or decision.
Back to Table of Contents