FY 2010 6.3 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2010 5.1 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2010 4.7 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2010 4.5 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors FY 2010 4.4 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2010 4.0 Other FY 2010 3.2 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation FY 2010 2.9 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other FY 2010 2.9 *RFC - Other FY 2010 2.7 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2011 8.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2011 4.7 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2011 4.7 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2011 4.3 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2011 3.8 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors FY 2011 3.1 Other FY 2011 2.9 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2011 2.9 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation FY 2011 2.7 *RFC - Other FY 2011 2.6 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other FY 2012 9.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2012 5.0 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2012 4.9 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2012 4.1 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2012 3.4 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2012 2.9 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other FY 2012 2.8 *RFC - Manipulative Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2012 2.8 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors FY 2012 2.6 Other FY 2012 2.6 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation FY 2013 9.4 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2013 6.3 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2013 4.4 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2013 3.9 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2013 3.5 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2013 3.4 *RFC - Manipulative Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2013 3.2 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other FY 2013 2.6 Other FY 2013 2.6 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation FY 2013 2.3 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors FY 2014 8.7 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2014 6.2 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2014 3.9 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2014 3.8 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2014 3.8 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2014 2.7 *RFC - Manipulative Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2014 2.6 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2014 2.4 Non-Examining Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed FY 2014 2.4 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation FY 2014 2.2 Other FY 2015 7.6 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2015 6.2 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2015 3.7 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2015 3.5 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2015 3.2 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2015 3.0 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2015 2.7 Non-Examining Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed FY 2015 2.3 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2015 2.3 Miscellaneous - Other FY 2015 2.0 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 7.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 7.0 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 3.0 Treating Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 3.0 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 3.2 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 3.0 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 3.0 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 2.3 Other FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 2.3 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2016 (52 Weeks) 2.0 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Notices Sent to Incorrect Address/Person FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 7.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 7.0 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 3.0 Treating Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 3.0 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 3.2 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 3.0 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 3.0 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 2.3 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 2.3 Other FY 2016 (53 Weeks) 2.0 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Notices Sent to Incorrect Address/Person FY 2017 5.6 New Evidence Presented to Agency (Reasonable Probability) FY 2017 3.7 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2017 3.5 Other FY 2017 3.3 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2017 2.9 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Notices Sent to Incorrect Address/Person FY 2017 2.9 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2017 2.8 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence FY 2017 2.5 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2017 2.5 Inadequate Support/Development of Onset Date/Closed Period/CDR FY 2017 2.5 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2018 5.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2018 4.0 Other FY 2018 3.0 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Notices Sent to Incorrect Address/Person FY 2018 3.0 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2018 2.6 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence FY 2018 2.5 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed FY 2018 2.4 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2018 2.4 New Evidence Presented to Agency (Reasonable Probability) FY 2018 2.3 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered FY 2018 2.2 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion * RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations or restrictions. FY 2019 5.8 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2019 4.9 Other FY 2019 3.4 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2019 3.4 Incomplete / Inaccurate Record - Record Inadequately Developed FY 2019 2.7 New Evidence Presented to Agency (Reasonable Probability) FY 2019 2.5 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2019 2.4 Treating Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed FY 2019 2.3 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion FY 2019 2.3 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Notices Sent to Incorrect Address/Person FY 2019 2.2 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence * RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations or restrictions. FY 2020 5.7 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2020 3.8 SPECIAL CASE PROCESSING FY 2020 3.6 Evidence In The Record Not Considered Or Exhibited FY 2020 2.7 * RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2020 2.2 Incomplete / Inaccurate Record - Record Inadequately Developed FY 2020 2.1 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence FY 2020 1.9 Medical Source Opinion(s) Not Identified or Discussed FY 2020 1.9 VE and DOT Not Reconciled (e.g., sit/stand limitations , time off task, etc.) FY 2020 1.8 Inadequate Rationale for Symptom Evaluation Finding FY 2020 1.8 Other * RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations or restrictions. FY 2021 5.9 RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2021 4.9 Evidence In The Record Not Considered Or Exhibited FY 2021 4.1 Medical Source Opinion(s) Not Identified or Discussed FY 2021 3.2 Inadequate Rationale for Symptom Evaluation Finding FY 2021 2.9 Inadequate Articulation of Supportability of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2021 2.8 * RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2021 2.5 Need For Assistive Device Not Adequately Evaluated FY 2021 2.1 Incomplete / Inaccurate Record - Record Inadequately Developed FY 2021 2.0 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence FY 2021 1.6 VE and DOT Not Reconciled (e.g., sit/stand limitations , time off task, etc.) * RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations or restrictions. FY 2022 10.0 SPECIAL CASE PROCESSING FY 2022 6.0 Evidence In The Record Not Considered Or Exhibited FY 2022 4.2 RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2022 3.3 Inadequate Rationale for Symptom Evaluation Finding FY 2022 3.2 Medical Source Opinion(s) Not Identified or Discussed FY 2022 2.2 Need For Assistive Device Not Adequately Evaluated FY 2022 2.1 Inadequate Articulation of Supportability of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2022 1.9 CDR - Other FY 2022 1.7 Incomplete / Inaccurate Record - Lost / Inaudible Recording FY 2022 1.7 New Evidence Presented to Agency (Reasonable Probability) FY 2022 9.9 SPECIAL CASE PROCESSING FY 2022 6.0 Evidence In The Record Not Considered Or Exhibited FY 2022 4.2 RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2022 3.3 Inadequate Rationale for Symptom Evaluation Finding FY 2022 3.2 Medical Source Opinion(s) Not Identified or Discussed FY 2022 2.1 Need For Assistive Device Not Adequately Evaluated FY 2022 2.1 Inadequate Articulation of Supportability of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2022 1.9 CDR - Other FY 2022 1.7 Incomplete / Inaccurate Record - Lost / Inaudible Recording FY 2022 1.7 New Evidence Presented to Agency (Reasonable Probability) FY 2023 6.0 Evidence In The Record Not Considered Or Exhibited FY 2023 3.8 RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2023 3.5 RFound Persuasive Without Adequate Articulation FY 2023 3.5 Medical Source Opinion(s) Not Identified or Discussed FY 2023 3.3 Inadequate Rationale for Symptom Evaluation Finding FY 2023 2.7 SPECIAL CASE PROCESSING FY 2023 2.6 CDR - Other FY 2023 2.1 Inadequate Articulation of Supportability of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2023 2.1 Need For Assistive Device Not Adequately Evaluated FY 2023 1.9 New Evidence Presented to Agency (Reasonable Probability) FY 2024 7.9 VE and DOT Not Reconciled (e.g., sit/stand limitations , time off task, etc.) FY 2024 4.6 Evidence In The Record Not Considered Or Exhibited FY 2024 3.8 Inadequate Articulation of Supportability of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2024 3.5 SPECIAL CASE PROCESSING FY 2024 3.5 Found Persuasive Without Adequate Articulation FY 2024 3.1 Medical Source Opinion(s) Not Identified or Discussed FY 2024 2.5 RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2024 2.5 Inadequate Rationale for Symptom Evaluation Finding FY 2024 2.4 Inadequate Articulation of Consistency of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2024 2.2 Conflicting VE Evidence Not Reconciled FY 2025 5.0 Evidence In The Record Not Considered Or Exhibited FY 2025 4.9 Inadequate Articulation of Supportability of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2025 4.8 Found Persuasive Without Adequate Articulation FY 2025 4.7 VE and DOT Not Reconciled (e.g., sit/stand limitations , time off task, etc.) FY 2025 4.1 Medical Source Opinion(s) Not Identified or Discussed FY 2025 3.7 Inadequate Articulation of Consistency of Medical Source Opinion(s) FY 2025 2.7 Inadequate Rationale for Symptom Evaluation Finding FY 2025 2.6 RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated FY 2025 2.1 Inadequate Articulation of Supportability of Prior Administrative Medical Findings FY 2025 2.1 Need For Assistive Device Not Adequately Evaluated