2019 OASDI Trustees Report

skip to main content
Table of Contents Previous Next Tables Figures Index

The Trustees use three types of financial measures to assess the actuarial status of the Social Security trust funds under the financing approach specified in current law: (1) annual cash-flow measures, including income rates, cost rates, and balances; (2) trust fund ratios; and (3) summary measures such as actuarial balances and unfunded obligations.
The difference between the annual income rate and annual cost rate, both expressed as percentages of taxable payroll, is the annual balance. The level and trend of the annual balances at the end of the 75-year projection period are factors that the Trustees use to assess the financial condition of the program.
The trust fund ratio for a year is the proportion of the year’s projected cost that could be paid with funds available at the beginning of the year. Critical factors considered by the Trustees in assessing actuarial status include: (1) the level and year of maximum trust fund ratio, (2) the year of depletion of the fund reserves and the percent of scheduled benefits that is still payable after reserves are depleted, and (3) the stability of the trust fund ratio at the end of the long-range period.
Solvency at any point in time requires that sufficient financial resources are available to pay all scheduled benefits at that time. Solvency is generally indicated by a positive trust fund ratio. “Sustainable solvency” for the financing of the program under a specified set of assumptions is achieved when the projected trust fund ratio is positive throughout the 75‑year projection period and is either stable or rising at the end of the period.
The Trustees summarize the total income and cost over valuation periods that extend through 75 years and over the infinite horizon.1 This section presents several summarized measures, including the actuarial balance and the open- group unfunded obligation. The actuarial balance indicates the size of any surplus or shortfall as a percentage of the taxable payroll over the period. The open-group unfunded obligation indicates the size of any shortfall in present-value dollars.
This section also includes additional information that the Trustees use to assess the financial status of the Social Security program, including: (1) a comparison of the number of beneficiaries to the number of covered workers, (2) the test of long-range close actuarial balance, and (3) the reasons for the change in the actuarial balance from the last report.
1. Annual Income Rates, Cost Rates, and Balances
The concepts of income rate and cost rate, expressed as percentages of taxable payroll, are important in the consideration of the long-range actuarial status of the trust funds. The annual income rate is the ratio of all non-interest income to the OASDI taxable payroll for the year. Non-interest income includes payroll taxes, taxes on scheduled benefits, and any General Fund transfers or reimbursements. The OASDI taxable payroll consists of the total earnings subject to OASDI taxes with some relatively small adjustments.2 The annual cost rate is the ratio of the cost of the program to the taxable payroll for the year. The cost includes scheduled benefits, administrative expenses, net interchange with the Railroad Retirement program, and payments for vocational rehabilitation services for disabled beneficiaries. For any year, the income rate minus the cost rate is the “balance” for the year.
Table IV.B1 presents a comparison of the estimated annual income rates and cost rates by trust fund and alternative. Table IV.B2 shows the separate components of the annual income rates.
Under the intermediate assumptions, the Trustees project that the OASI income rate will increase from 10.33 percent of payroll for 2018 to 11.01 percent of payroll for 2019. The OASI income rate was lower for 2016 through 2018 because of the payroll tax rate reallocation of 0.57 percentage point from OASI to DI for those years, as enacted in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. After returning to the pre-reallocation level for 2019, the income rate generally rises at a very gradual rate to 11.52 percent of taxable payroll for 2093. Income from taxation of benefits causes a gradual increase in the OASI income rate for two main reasons: (1) total scheduled benefits are rising faster than payroll; and (2) the benefit-taxation threshold amounts are fixed (not indexed), and therefore an increasing share of total benefits will be subject to tax as incomes and benefits rise. There is also a one-time upward shift in the income rate, from 11.17 percent of payroll for 2025 to 11.29 percent of payroll for 2026, because of increased taxation of benefits due to expiration of the personal income tax provisions in Public Law 115-97, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
From 2019 to 2038, the OASI cost rate rises rapidly because the retirement of the baby-boom generation will continue to increase the number of beneficiaries much faster than the number of workers increases, as subsequent lower-birth-rate generations replace the baby-boom generation at working ages. From 2039 to 2052, the cost rate declines because the aging baby-boom generation is gradually replaced at retirement ages by the subsequently lower-birth-rate generation born between 1966 and 1989. After 2052, the projected OASI cost rate generally rises, reaching 15.37 percent of taxable payroll for 2093, with the increase primarily because of projected reductions in death rates at older ages.
Projections of income rates under the low-cost and high-cost sets of assumptions are similar to those projected for the intermediate assumptions, because income rates are largely a reflection of the payroll tax rates specified in the law, with the changes from taxation of benefits noted above. In contrast, OASI cost rates for the low-cost and high-cost assumptions are significantly different from those projected for the intermediate assumptions. For the low-cost assumptions, the OASI cost rate decreases between 2019 and 2020, and then rises until it peaks in 2034 at 12.55 percent of payroll. The cost rate then declines to 11.52 percent for 2055, rises to 11.72 percent for 2072, and declines again to 11.10 percent for 2089 before rising to 11.22 percent for 2093, at which point the income rate reaches 11.26 percent. For the high-cost assumptions, the OASI cost rate rises throughout the 75-year period. It rises relatively rapidly through about 2039 because of the aging of the baby-boom generation. Thereafter, the cost rate continues to rise and reaches 21.80 percent of payroll for 2093, at which point the income rate reaches 11.91 percent.
The pattern of the projected OASI annual balance is important in the analysis of the financial condition of the program. Under the intermediate assumptions, the annual balance is negative throughout the projection period. This annual deficit was temporarily higher for 2018 in part because of the 0.57‑percentage-point payroll tax rate reallocation from OASI to DI. After the annual deficit declines from 1.42 percent of payroll for 2018 to 0.94 percent for 2019, it then rises relatively rapidly to 3.29 percent for 2039. It then declines to 2.90 percent of payroll for 2052, and generally rises thereafter, reaching 3.85 percent of taxable payroll for 2093.
Under the low-cost assumptions, after the 2016 through 2018 payroll tax rate reallocation period, the OASI annual deficit decreases from 0.82 percent of payroll in 2019 to 0.69 percent in 2021, and then generally rises to 1.25 percent of payroll for 2034. Then the annual deficit declines to 0.25 percent of payroll for 2055, rises through 2072, and then declines until it becomes a positive annual balance in 2085. The annual balance increases to 0.16 percent in 2089, and then decreases to 0.05 percent of payroll in 2093. Under the high-cost assumptions, the OASI balance worsens throughout the projection period. Annual deficits rise to 1.50 percent for 2020, 6.26 percent for 2050, and 9.89 percent of payroll for 2093.
rate a

Income rates include certain reimbursements from the General Fund of the Treasury.

Benefit payments scheduled to be paid on January 3 are actually paid on December 31 as required by the statutory provision for early delivery of benefit payments when the normal payment delivery date is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal public holiday. For comparability with the values for historical years and the projections in this report, all trust fund operations and asset reserves reflect the 12 months of benefits scheduled for payment each year.

The annual balance is projected to be negative for a temporary period and return to positive levels before the end of the projection period.

1. The income rate excludes interest income.
2. Revisions of taxable payroll may change some historical values.
3. Totals do not necessarily equal the sums of rounded components.
Under the intermediate assumptions, the projected DI cost rate declines from 1.97 percent for 2019 to 1.77 percent for 2025, and remains relatively stable through 2032. After 2032, the DI cost rate increases gradually to 2.03 percent for 2055. From 2055 to 2078, the DI cost rate stays relatively stable before generally increasing slowly to 2.10 percent of payroll for 2093. The projected DI income rate decreases from 2.34 percent of payroll for 2018 to 1.84 percent for 2019 because the temporary payroll tax reallocation of 2016 through 2018 expires. Thereafter, the income rate remains relatively stable, reaching 1.84 percent for 2093. The annual balance is positive for years 2016 through 2018, reflecting the reallocation. The annual balance is negative from 2019 through 2021 before becoming positive in 2022, reaching a peak of 0.07 percent of payroll for 2029. The annual balance then declines and becomes negative in 2036, generally decreasing thereafter, and reaching a deficit of 0.26 percent of payroll for 2093.
Under the low-cost assumptions, the projected DI cost rate declines from 1.91 percent of payroll for 2019 to 1.38 percent for 2033, and remains relatively stable thereafter, reaching 1.44 percent for 2093. The annual balance is negative for 2019 and positive throughout the remainder of the long-range period. Under the high-cost assumptions, the DI cost rate generally rises throughout the projection period, reaching 2.93 percent for 2093. The annual deficit is negative throughout the projection period, reaching 0.22 percent for 2020, 0.93 percent for 2050, and 1.07 percent for 2093.
Figure IV.B1 shows the patterns of the historical and projected OASI and DI annual cost rates. Annual DI cost rates rose substantially between 1990 and 2010 in large part due to: (1) aging of the working population as the baby-boom generation moved from ages 25-44 in 1990, where disability prevalence is low, to ages 45-64 in 2010, where disability prevalence is much higher; (2) a substantial increase in the percentage of women insured for DI benefits as a result of increased and more consistent rates of employment; and (3) increased disability incidence rates for women to a level similar to those for men by 2010. As of 2010, these three factors have largely stabilized. Other factors that are not yet fully understood have caused age-sex-adjusted incidence rates and cost rates to decline after 2010, and further declines are projected until about 2030. OASI cost rates increase rapidly through about 2040 as the baby-boom generation ages and is replaced by lower birth-rate generations at working ages. Thereafter, increasing life expectancy results in generally much more modest increases in cost rates through the balance of the projection period. Figure IV.B1 shows only the income rates for alternative II because the variation in income rates by alternative is very small. Income rates generally increase slowly for each of the alternatives over the long-range period. Taxation of benefits, which is a relatively small portion of income, is the main source of both the increases in the income rate and the variation among the alternatives. Increases in income from taxation of benefits reflect: (1) increases in the total amount of benefits scheduled to be paid and (2) the increasing share of individual benefits that will be subject to taxation because benefit taxation threshold amounts are not indexed.
Table IV.B1 shows the annual balances for OASI, DI, and OASDI. The pattern of the annual balances is important to the analysis of the financial condition of the Social Security program as a whole. As seen in figure  IV.B1, the magnitude of each of the positive balances is the distance between the appropriate cost-rate curve and the income-rate curve above it. The magnitude of each of the deficits is the distance between the appropriate cost-rate curve and the income-rate curve below it. Annual balances follow closely the pattern of annual cost rates after 1990 because the payroll tax rate does not change for the OASDI program, with only small variations in the allocation between DI and OASI except for changes due to the 1994 and the 2016 through 2018 payroll tax rate reallocations.
In the future, the costs of OASI, DI, and the combined OASDI programs as a percentage of taxable payroll are unlikely to fall outside the range encompassed by alternatives I and III because alternatives I and III define a wide range of demographic and economic conditions.
Long-range OASDI cost and income are most often expressed as percentages of taxable payroll. However, the Trustees also present cost and income as shares of gross domestic product (GDP), the value of goods and services produced during the year in the United States. Under alternative II, the Trustees project OASDI cost to increase from about 4.9 percent of GDP for 2019 to about 5.9 percent for 2039. After 2039, OASDI cost as a percentage of GDP declines to a low of about 5.8 percent for 2052 and thereafter generally increases slowly, reaching about 6.0 percent by 2093. Appendix G presents full estimates of income and cost relative to GDP.
Table IV.B2 contains historical and projected annual income rates and their components by trust fund and alternative. The annual income rates consist of the scheduled payroll tax rates, the rates of income from taxation of scheduled benefits, and the rates of income from General Fund reimbursements. Projected income from taxation of benefits increases over time for reasons discussed on page 51.
General Fund Reim-burse-mentsb