You are here: Social Security Administration > Research, Statistics & Policy Analysis > Selected Research & Analysis by Subject > Retirement Income > Deferred Compensation (Pensions, Retirement Plans)

Selected Research & Analysis: Retirement Income > Deferred Compensation (Pensions, Retirement Plans)

State and Local Government Employees Without Social Security Coverage: What Percentage Will Earn Pension Benefits That Fall Short of Social Security Equivalence?
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 82, No. 3 (released August 2022)
by Jean-Pierre Aubry, Siyan Liu, Alicia H. Munnell, Laura D. Quinby, and Glenn R. Springstead

Social Security is designed to provide a base of retirement income, to be supplemented in part by employer-sponsored retirement plans. However, approximately one-quarter of state and local government employees are not covered by Social Security, which federal law allows if their employer-provided plans provide comparable benefits. Yet many public pensions are less generous for recent hires, raising questions of whether those plans will still provide Social Security–equivalent benefits. The authors analyze 66 plans and project that a significant minority of them are likely to fall short of providing Social Security–equivalent benefits, potentially affecting 750,000 to 1 million noncovered workers annually.

Vesting Requirements and Key Benefit-Formula Features of State and Local Government Pension Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 81, No. 1 (released February 2021)
by Glenn R. Springstead

State and local governments provide pensions to their employees instead of or along with Social Security coverage. The Great Recession and other events have adversely affected some state and local budgets, leading to pension reforms that aim to lower benefits and bolster funding levels. Using data for 2016–2019 from fund financial reports and independent research center databases, this article examines three key components of standard pension benefit formulas: vesting periods, final-average-salary computation periods, and benefit multipliers. This analysis is the first to examine those characteristics at the level of individual benefit tiers in state and local pension systems, and more significantly, to weight the statistics by the number of active members within each tier. Results are shown for tiers grouped by Social Security coverage status, worker occupation group, and whether the tier is open or closed to new hires.

Pensions for State and Local Government Workers Not Covered by Social Security: Do Benefits Meet Federal Standards?
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 80, No. 3 (released August 2020)
by Laura D. Quinby, Jean-Pierre Aubry, and Alicia H. Munnell

Federal law allows certain state and local governments to exclude employees from Social Security coverage if the employees are provided with a sufficiently generous pension. Approximately 6.5 million such workers were not covered by Social Security in 2018. Retirement systems for noncovered workers have become less generous in recent years, and a few plans could exhaust their trust funds within the next decade, putting beneficiaries at risk. This article examines data from a variety of sources to assess whether state and local governments currently satisfy the federal standards for retirement plan sufficiency and whether the standards ensure benefits equivalent to those from Social Security.

Retirement Savings Inequality: Different Effects of Earnings Shocks, Portfolio Selections, and Employer Contributions by Worker Earnings Level
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 78, No. 3 (released August 2018)
by Joelle Saad-Lessler, Teresa Ghilarducci, and Gayle L. Reznik

Changes in accumulated retirement savings, particularly in employer-sponsored defined contribution (DC) plan balances, differ by worker earnings levels. Earnings shocks, portfolio diversification, and employer contributions to workers’ DC plans affect retirement savings for lower earners more than for higher earners. The authors match Survey of Income and Program Participation data to Social Security Administration earnings records and find factors underlying the different retirement savings outcomes by earnings level beyond mere differences in earnings.

Social Security Retirement Benefits and Private Annuities: A Comparative Analysis
Issue Paper No. 2017-01 (released May 2017)
by Dale Kintzel

Retirement income in the United States has been described as a three-legged stool composed of Social Security benefits, personal savings, and employer-based retirement plans. For the latter, today's workers usually have a defined contribution plan in which the worker and employer contribute to the plan and the worker bears the risk for account performance. At retirement, the worker has the option of purchasing an annuity, which is similar to Social Security benefits and traditional defined benefit pension plans insofar as they provide a steady income stream for life. This issue paper examines the similarities and differences between Social Security retirement benefits and annuities, and the factors that determine how much lifetime retirement income an individual would receive.

Contributory Retirement Saving Plans: Differences Across Earnings Groups and Implications for Retirement Security
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 77, No. 2 (released May 2017)
by Irena Dushi, Howard M. Iams, and Christopher R. Tamborini

This article examines how savings in defined contribution (DC) retirement plans vary across the earnings distribution. Specifically, the authors investigate the extent of an earnings gradient in access to, participation in, and levels of contribution to DC plans. Using a nationally representative sample of Survey of Income and Program Participation respondents linked to data from their W-2 tax records, the authors find that DC plan access, participation, and contributions increase as earnings increase, even after controlling for key socioeconomic and labor-market covariates. They also find that, despite changing economic conditions, the earnings gradient changed little between 2006 and 2012.

Retirement Plan Coverage by Firm Size: An Update
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 75, No. 2 (released May 2015)
by Irena Dushi, Howard M. Iams, and Jules Lichtenstein

This article provides an update of the relationship between pension plan coverage and firm size among private-sector workers, using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) for 3 years: 2006, 2009, and 2012. Following previous work, our measures of pension coverage and participation take into account, and correct for, survey-response errors in the SIPP by using information in the W-2 records regarding tax-deferred earnings to defined contribution plans. The authors' findings show that compared with 2006, the offer and participation rates of any pension plan slightly increased in 2009 and 2012. Throughout the 2006–2012 period, offer and participation rates differed substantially by firm size, whereas there was little difference in the take-up rate.

Pension Plan Participation Among Married Couples
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 73, No. 3 (released August 2013)
by Irena Dushi and Howard M. Iams

This article presents descriptive statistics on pension participation and the types of plans among married couples, using data from the 1996 and 2008 Panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation and Social Security administrative records. The findings indicate that in only 20 percent of couples, neither of the spouses participated in a pension plan; in about 10 percent of couples, the wife was the only one participating in a retirement plan; and in 37 percent of couples, the husband was the only one participating. Despite the substantial changes in pension landscape over the past decade, the findings reveal only modest changes in participation rates and in the types of plans respondents participated in between 1998 and 2009.

Contribution Dynamics in Defined Contribution Pension Plans During the Great Recession of 2007–2009
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 73, No. 2 (released May 2013)
by Irena Dushi, Howard M. Iams, and Christopher R. Tamborini

The authors investigate the extent of changes in workers' participation and contributions to defined contribution (DC) plans during the Great Recession of 2007–2009. Using longitudinal information from Social Security W-2 tax records matched to a nationally representative sample of respondents from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, they find that the recent economic downturn had a considerable impact on workers' participation and contributions to DC plans. A sizable segment of 2007 participants (39 percent) decreased their contributions to DC plans by more than 10 percent during the Great Recession. The findings also highlight the interrelationship between the dynamics in DC contributions and earnings changes.

Defined Contribution Pension Participation and Contributions by Earnings Levels Using Administrative Data
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 71, No. 2 (released May 2011)
by Irena Dushi, Howard M. Iams, and Christopher R. Tamborini

This article examines the relationship between earnings levels and participation and contribution rates in defined contribution (DC) retirement plans. Specifically, the article estimates DC plan participation and contribution rates in 2006 both by the worker's current earnings and by the annual average of real earnings over the 10-year period 1997–2006. Using these two different measures of earnings allows us to assess whether employing a longer period of earnings, such as a decade, provides a better representation of pension outcomes than the short-term measure of current earnings.

Assessment of Retirement Plan Coverage by Firm Size Using W-2 Tax Records
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 71, No. 2 (released May 2011)
by Irena Dushi, Howard M. Iams, and Jules Lichtenstein

Of particular interest in this article is the relationship between firm size and pension coverage and participation because small businesses tend to be less likely to offer retirement benefits to their employees than do large businesses. This relationship is particularly important given the current administration's retirement proposals to create automatic individual retirement accounts. Obviously, accurate information is important not only in formulating retirement income security policies that target workers without retirement plan coverage, but also to assess the impact of such policies on workers' retirement plan participation.

The Impact of Response Error on Participation Rates and Contributions to Defined Contribution Pension Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 70, No. 1 (released February 2010)
by Irena Dushi and Howard M. Iams

The accuracy of information about coverage and contributions to defined contribution (DC) pension plans is important in understanding the economic well-being of future retirees because these plans are an increasingly important part of retirement income security. Using data from the 1996 and 2004 panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) merged with information from W-2 tax records, we examine the extent to which estimated participation rates and contribution amounts to DC plans derived from SIPP reports differ from estimates obtained from tax-deferred contributions in the W-2 tax records.

The Disappearing Defined Benefit Pension and Its Potential Impact on the Retirement Incomes of Baby Boomers
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 69, No. 3 (released October 2009)
by Barbara A. Butrica, Howard M. Iams, Karen E. Smith, and Eric J. Toder

A large share of traditional defined benefit pension plans have frozen within the past decade and evidence suggests that this trend will continue in the future. This article uses the Model of Income in the Near Term (MINT) microsimulation model to project the impact on boomers' retirement incomes of freezing traditional pension plans and replacing them with 401(k)-type plans. The projections suggest that the largest impact will be for the most recent boomers born between 1961 and 1965.

Cohort Differences in Wealth and Pension Participation of Near-Retirees
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 68, No. 3 (released December 2008)
by Irena Dushi and Howard M. Iams

This article examines pension participation and nonpension net worth of two cohorts of near retirees. Particularly, the authors look at people born in 1933 through 1939 who were ages 55–61 in 1994, and the more recent cohort consisting of people of the same age in 2004 who were born in 1943 through 1949. Data are from the Health and Retirement Study, a longitudinal, nationally representative survey of older Americans.

Chile's Next Generation Pension Reform
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 68, No. 2 (released October 2008)
by Barbara E. Kritzer

Since its inception in 1981, Chile's system of mandatory individual retirement accounts has become a model for pension reformers around the world. A March 2008 comprehensive pension reform law made major changes that address some key policy challenges including worker coverage, gender equity, pension adequacy, and administrative fees. The cornerstone of the new law sets up a basic universal pension as a supplement to the individual accounts system.

Trends in Elective Deferrals of Earnings from 1990–2001 in Social Security Administrative Data
Research and Statistics Note No. 2008-03 (released June 2008)
by David Pattison and Hilary Waldron
KiwiSaver: New Zealand's New Subsidized Retirement Savings Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 4 (released May 2008)
by Barbara E. Kritzer

On July 1, 2007, New Zealand introduced KiwiSaver, a new subsidized retirement savings plan. All new entrants to the labor force and anyone starting a new job are automatically enrolled in a plan and may opt out if they wish. Anyone younger than age 65, including the self-employed and anyone not in the labor force, may choose to set up a KiwiSaver account. The government provides tax credits for both employer and account holder contributions, a one-time tax-free payment to each account, and an annual fee subsidy to defray administrative costs.

The Evolution of Japanese Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 3 (released April 2008)
by David Rajnes

This article examines the development of Japanese voluntary employer-sponsored retirement plans with an emphasis on recent trends. Before 2001, companies in Japan offered retirement benefits as lump-sum severance payments and/or benefits from one of two types of defined benefit (DB) pension plans. One DB plan type was based on an earlier occupational pension model used in the United States. The other DB plan type allowed companies to opt out of the earnings-related portion of social security. Landmark laws passed in 2001 introduced a new generation of occupational retirement plans to employers and employees, creating three new DB plan designs and two new defined contribution types of plans. Since that time, the mix of employer-sponsored retirement plans offered in Japan has changed significantly, and overall employee coverage has declined. On balance, employer-sponsored retirement plans have remained largely DB in design.

Effective Retirement Savings Programs: Design Features and Financial Education
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 3 (released April 2008)
by Anya Olsen and Kevin Whitman

This article provides an overview of the literature on best practices for retirement savings plan design and financial education in the workplace. Without a successful plan design, financial education will not be effective and even a well-structured plan can fail to achieve retirement savings goals without financial education. The main components of a retirement savings program that employers must consider include options for enrollment, investment choices, employer matching of contributions, and distributions over the working career and at retirement. In addition, employers control the core aspects of financial education, such as the topics covered, the delivery methods used, the frequency with which it is offered, and its general availability.

Defined Contribution Pension Plans and the Supplemental Security Income Program
Policy Brief No. 2006-01 (released March 2006)
by Rene Parent

This policy brief analyzes changes in the employer-sponsored pension system and the relationship of these changes to the Supplemental Security Income program's treatment of retirement plans. SSI does not treat assets in defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans in the same manner. The primary difference is that a potential SSI recipient has access to the funds in a defined contribution plan, but a participant in the defined benefit plan has no access to the pension until attaining a specific age. The increasing prevalence of the defined contribution retirement plan and the decreasing prevalence of the defined benefit plan is one significant change—a trend that has gained momentum since the mid-1980s. The importance of these issues relates to the extent of pension plan holdings among SSI applicants and recipients, which is in turn directly related to their involvement in the labor force. The policy brief discusses three alternate approaches to SSI treatment of defined contribution retirement plans, one of which is to retain the current policy.

Comparing Replacement Rates Under Private and Federal Retirement Systems
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 1 (released May 2004)
by Patricia P. Martin

This article presents a comparison of replacement rates for employees of medium and large private establishments to replacement rates for federal employees under the Civil Service Retirement System and the Federal Employees Retirement System. This analysis shows the possibility of replacement rates exceeding 100 percent for FERS employees who contribute 6 percent of earnings to the Thrift Savings Plan over a full working career. Private-sector replacement rates were quite similar for workers with both a defined benefit and a defined contribution pension plan.

Does Retirement Education Teach People to Save Pension Distributions?
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 64, No. 4 (released June 2003)
by Leslie A. Muller

Education about retirement affects how employees use distributions from their defined contribution pension plans. Retirement education substantially increases the probability that participants age 40 and under will save a distribution but decreases the probability that college graduates and women will save one. These important differentials are concealed by estimates of the effect of retirement education on participants generally.

Pension Sponsorship and Participation: Trends and Policy Issues
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 64, No. 2 (released September 2002)
by Patrick J. Purcell

This article summarizes recent trends in employer sponsorship of retirement plans and employee participation in those plans. It is based on data collected in surveys of employers conducted by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and surveys of households conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Variation of Employee Benefit Costs by Age
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 63, No. 4 (released September 2001)
by Anna Rappaport

How much an employer pays for employee benefits varies widely and depends on the age of the workforce and the structure of the benefits package offered. In general, costs increase for older workforces. The factors driving the differences in cost by age are the time value of money, employee pay, and rates of health care use, disability, and death. Case studies show how the benefit package varies by age in a large traditional company, a large financial services company, and a medium-sized retail company. An illustration is also provided for retirement benefits from two sample plans to show how the benefits are earned over time.

Pension Integration and Social Security Reform
ORES Working Paper No. 75 (released July 1998)
by Chuck Slusher

Many employer-provided pension plans explicitly account for Social Security in their benefit formulas—a practice known as integration. Because integrated pensions are directly linked to Social Security, both the incidence and design of explicitly integrated plans are likely to be affected by changes in the current Social Security program. While integration has been mentioned as an important issue in discussions of Social Security reform, researchers have largely ignored the concept of pension integration. This paper provides basic information about pension integration and addresses, in general terms, the relationship between Social Security reform and pension integration.

Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, Fiscal Year 1991
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 1 (released January 1995)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
Pension Coverage Among the Baby Boomers: Initial Findings From a 1993 Survey
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 57, No. 3 (released July 1994)
by John R. Woods
Pension Vesting and Preretirement Lump Sums Among Full-Time Private Sector Employees
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 3 (released July 1993)
by John R. Woods
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, Fiscal Year 1990
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 3 (released July 1993)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
The Role of Pensions in Retirement Income: Trends and Questions
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 1 (released January 1993)
by Virginia P. Reno
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, Fiscal Year 1989
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 55, No. 2 (released April 1992)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, Fiscal Year 1987
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 53, No. 6 (released June 1990)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
Pension Coverage Among Private Wage and Salary Workers: Preliminary Findings From the 1988 Survey of Employee Benefits
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 52, No. 10 (released October 1989)
by John R. Woods
Pension Coverage Among Private Wage and Salary Workers: Preliminary Findings from the 1988 Survey of Employee Benefits
ORES Working Paper No. 38 (released August 1989)
by John R. Woods

Pension coverage is declining in the United States, and most of the decline can be attributed to decreasing coverage among younger workers. In addition, it appears that the types of pension coverage are shifting, with a decline in traditional pension plans and an increase in 401(k) plans.

These are perhaps the most important findings from a 1988 survey of American workers, similar to pension surveys in 1972, 1979, and 1983. The 1988 survey collected data from a sample representing 114 million workers who were currently employed. This paper examines patterns of pension coverage among all private wage and salary workers, but focuses on those working full time.

Retirement-Age Women and Pensions: Findings From the New Beneficiary Survey
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 51, No. 12 (released December 1988)
by John R. Woods
The Relationships Between Public and Private Pension Schemes: An Introductory Overview
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 50, No. 7 (released July 1987)
by Max Horlick
Pension Status of Recently Retired Workers on Their Longest Job: Findings From the New Beneficiary Survey
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 49, No. 8 (released August 1986)
by Donald C. Snyder
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, 1983
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 49, No. 4 (released April 1986)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
The Retirement Equity Act of 1984: A Review
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 48, No. 5 (released May 1985)
by Edmund T. Donovan
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, 1981 and 1982
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 48, No. 4 (released April 1985)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
The Norris Decision
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 47, No. 4 (released April 1984)
by Martha Remy Yohalem
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Programs, 1980
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 47, No. 1 (released January 1984)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
Private Pensions: 1982 Legislation
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 46, No. 8 (released August 1983)
by Gene Carter
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, 1979
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 45, No. 12 (released December 1982)
by Ann Kallman Bixby
Vesting of Private Pension Benefits in 1979 and Change From 1972
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 7 (released July 1981)
by Gayle Thompson Rogers
Coverage Patterns of Full-Time Employees Under Private Retirement Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 7 (released July 1981)
by Daniel J. Beller
Pension Coverage and Vesting Among Private Wage and Salary Workers, 1979: Preliminary Estimates from the 1979 Survey of Pension Plan Coverage
ORES Working Paper No. 16 (released June 1980)
by Gayle Thompson Rogers

This paper examines pension coverage and vesting in 1979 among private wage and salary workers aged 14 and older in the employed labor force. Coverage and vested status are examined in relation to personal and current job characteristics in order to provide a profile of workers protected and not protected under the private retirement system. The data are derived from the 1979 Survey of Pension Plan Coverage, a supplement to the May 1979 Current Population Survey.

Three major findings emerge from the analysis. First, coverage rates among full-time workers increased slightly between 1972 and 1979, and vested rates increased substantially during the same period. Second, although coverage rates were moderate to high for certain groups of workers, many workers were not in these groups. Third, women were much less likely than men to be covered by a retirement plan and to have acquired vested rights to their benefits.

Inflation and the Accumulation of Assets in Private Pension Funds
ORES Working Paper No. 14 (released April 1980)
by John A. Turner

This paper examines the effect of inflation on private pension saving. The role that private pensions can or should play in providing income in old age in the current inflationary environment is an important policy issue. A number of studies have discussed the effect of inflation on pensions. This study extends the existing analysis and presents the first empirical estimates. Inflation is seen to have a large negative effect on this aspect of retirement saving by workers.

Benefits and Beneficiaries Under Public Employee Retirement Systems, Calendar Year 1977
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 43, No. 4 (released April 1980)
by Ann Kallman Bixby and Alma W. McMillan
Mandating Private Pensions: Experience in Four European Countries
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 3 (released March 1979)
by Max Horlick
Black-White Differences in Private Pensions: Findings From the Retirement History Study
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 2 (released February 1979)
by Gayle B. Thompson
Impact of Inflation on Private Pensions of Retirees, 1970–74: Findings From the Retirement History Study
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 11 (released November 1978)
by Gayle B. Thompson
Pension Coverage and Benefits, 1972: Findings From the Retirement History Study
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 2 (released February 1978)
by Gayle B. Thompson
Employee-Benefit Plans, 1975
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 11 (released November 1977)
by Martha Remy Yohalem
Twenty-Five Years of Employee-Benefit Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 9 (released September 1976)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Private Pension Plans, 1950–74
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 6 (released June 1976)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Revised Coverage Estimates for Employee-Benefit Plan Series
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 10 (released October 1975)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Employee-Benefit Plans, 1973
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 5 (released May 1975)
by Walter W. Kolodrubetz
Pension Reform Legislation of 1974
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 37, No. 12 (released December 1974)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Coverage and Vesting of Full-Time Employees Under Private Retirement Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 36, No. 11 (released November 1973)
by Walter W. Kolodrubetz and Donald M. Landay
Switzerland: Compulsory Private Pensions
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 36, No. 10 (released October 1973)
by Max Horlick
Private Retirement Benefits and Relationship to Earnings: Survey of New Beneficiaries
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 36, No. 5 (released May 1973)
by Walter W. Kolodrubetz
Second Pensions Among Newly Entitled Workers: Survey of New Beneficiaries
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 11 (released November 1971)
by Lenore E. Bixby and Virginia P. Reno
Characteristics of Workers With Pension Coverage on Longest Job: New Beneficiaries
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 11 (released November 1971)
by Walter W. Kolodrubetz
Private and Public Retirement Pensions: Findings from the 1968 Survey of the Aged
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 9 (released September 1970)
by Walter W. Kolodrubetz
Funding Under Private Pension Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 10 (released October 1969)
by Nancy Crisman
Employee-Benefit Plans in 1966
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 4 (released April 1968)
by Walter W. Kolodrubetz
Private Pensions and Individual Savings
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 5 (released May 1966)
by George Katona
Ten Years of Employee-Benefit Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 4 (released April 1966)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Public Policy and Private Pension Programs
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 7 (released July 1965)
Employee-Benefit Plans: Developments, 1954–63
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 4 (released April 1965)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Study of Retirement Policies and Practices in Industry
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 8 (released August 1964)
Definition of Disability in Private Pension Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 5 (released May 1964)
by Joseph Krislov
Employee-Benefit Plans, 1954–62
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 4 (released April 1964)
by Joseph Krislov
Private Pension Plan Terminations
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 12 (released December 1963)
by Joseph Krislov
Growth of Employee-Benefit Plans, 1954–61
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 4 (released April 1963)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Employee-Benefit Plans, 1954–60
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 4 (released April 1962)
by Alfred M. Skolnik
Private Employee-Benefit Plans Today
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 1 (released January 1957)
by Joseph Zisman
Private Pension Plans in Six Countries
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 8 (released August 1953)
by H. Walter Forster and Herman B. Brotman
Pensions in the United States: A Summary
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 3 (released March 1953)
Permanent and Total Disability Benefit Provisions in Industrial Pension Plans
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 1 (released January 1951)
by Joseph Zisman
Group Annuities Supplementing Retirement Benefits Under Old-Age and Survivors Insurance
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 6 (released June 1948)
by Weltha Van Eenam
Social Security for State and Local Government Employees
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 4 (released April 1945)
by Arthur J. Altmeyer
Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Civil Service Retirement Act
from Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 4, No. 4 (released April 1941)
by Ruth Reticker