Top 10 Remand Reasons Cited by the AC on Remands of RRs or Own Motion Reviews (FY 2010 – FY 2016)

Longitudinal report detailing the top 10 reasons for remands cited by the Appeals Council (AC) when returning requests for review (RRs) or own motion review actions to the hearing level offices during each of Fiscal Years 2010 – 2016. The report also contains the percentages of the top 10 reasons as compared to all cited remand reasons during the same years.

For FY 2016, this report has a listing for the normal 52 week fiscal year (9/26/2015 – 9/23/2016) and a second listing to include the extra 53rd week (9/26/2015 – 9/30/2016). Most fiscal years have just 52 weeks, however, FY 2016 had 53 weeks, which is an anomaly that occurs every five or six years.

Download this dataset in the XML format:

XML

FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2014 | FY 2015
FY 2016 (52 Weeks) | FY 2016 (53 Weeks)

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2010 6.3 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  5.1 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed
  4.7 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  4.5 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors
  4.4 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  4.0 Other
  3.2 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation
  2.9 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other
  2.9 *RFC - Other
  2.7 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2011 8.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  4.7 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed
  4.7 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  4.3 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  3.8 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors
  3.1 Other
  2.9 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  2.9 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation
  2.7 *RFC - Other
  2.6 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2012 9.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  5.0 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  4.9 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  4.1 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed
  3.4 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  2.9 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other
  2.8 *RFC - Manipulative Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  2.8 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors
  2.6 Other
  2.6 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2013 9.4 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  6.3 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  4.4 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  3.9 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed
  3.5 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  3.4 *RFC - Manipulative Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  3.2 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Other
  2.6 Other
  2.6 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation
  2.3 Claimant Credibility - Failed to Discuss Appropriate Credibility Factors
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2014 8.7 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  6.2 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  3.9 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed
  3.8 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  3.8 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  2.7 *RFC - Manipulative Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  2.6 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion
  2.4 Non-Examining Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed
  2.4 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation
  2.2 Other
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2015 7.6 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  6.2 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  3.7 Treating Source - Opinion Not identified or Discussed
  3.5 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  3.2 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion
  3.0 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  2.7 Non-Examining Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed
  2.3 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion
  2.3 Miscellaneous - Other
  2.0 Treating Source - Opinion Rejected Without Adequate Articulation
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2016
(52 Weeks)
7.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  7.0 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  3.0 Treating Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed
  3.0 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  3.2 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion
  3.0 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  3.0 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence
  2.3 Other
  2.3 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion
  2.0 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Notices Sent to Incorrect Address/Person
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Fiscal Year Percent of All Cited Reasons Remand Reason
2016
(53 Weeks)
7.0 *RFC - Mental Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  7.0 New Evidence Presented Upon Administrative Appeal / Review
  3.0 Treating Source - Opinion Not Identified or Discussed
  3.0 *RFC - Exertional Limitations Inadequately Evaluated
  3.2 Consultative Examiner - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion
  3.0 Mental Disorder Not Adequately Considered
  3.0 Inadequate Proffer of Post-Hearing Evidence
  2.3 Non-Examining Source - Inadequate Support/Rationale for Weight Given Opinion
  2.3 Other
  2.0 Failure to Appear Dismissal - Notices Sent to Incorrect Address/Person
* RFC = Residual functional capacity or the most a claimant can do despite his or her limitations
   or restrictions.

^Return to top

Disclaimer: These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.