2021 OASDI Trustees Report

skip to main content
Table of Contents Previous Next Tables Figures Index

B. ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS
The three alternative sets of economic assumptions provide a reasonable range for estimating the financial status of the trust funds. The intermediate assumptions reflect the Trustees’ consensus expectation of sustained moderate economic growth after completion of the recovery from the pandemic-induced recession that started in the first quarter of 2020, and their best estimate for other economic parameters. The low-cost assumptions represent a more optimistic outlook with a faster recovery to a higher level of economic output, stronger long-term economic growth, and relatively optimistic levels for other parameters. The high-cost assumptions represent a more pessimistic scenario with a second “dip” in gross domestic product (GDP) in 2021, prolonging the recession that started in 2020, slower economic growth in the long term, and relatively pessimistic levels for other parameters.
Actual economic data were generally available through the end of 2020 at the time the assumptions for this report were set. The data indicated that economic activity reached a peak in the fourth quarter of 2019.1 A precipitous decline in economic activity in March and April of 2020 led to GDP in the second quarter of 2020 being more than 10 percent below the peak in the fourth quarter of 2019. GDP recovered substantially by the fourth quarter of 2020, but was still about 2.4 percent below the level in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Under the intermediate assumptions, the economy is projected to reach its sustainable trend level of output in 2023. Under the low-cost assumptions, the economy is projected to recover at a faster rate and return to a higher sustainable trend level of output in 2022. Under the high-cost assumptions, the sustainable trend level is lower. GDP falls to about 5 percent below that lower sustainable trend level in the fourth quarter of 2021, and then recovers fully by 2028. Complete economic cycles have little effect on the long-range estimates of financial status of the trust funds, so the assumptions do not include cycles beyond the short-range period (2021 through 2030).
The key economic assumptions underlying the three sets of projections of the future financial status of the OASI and DI Trust Funds are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1. Productivity Assumptions
Total U.S. economy productivity is defined as the ratio of real GDP to hours worked by all workers.2 The rate of change in total-economy productivity is a major determinant of the growth of average earnings. Over the last six complete economic cycles (1969-73, 1973-79, 1979-90, 1990-2001, 2001‑07, and 2007-19, measured peak to peak), the annual increases in total-economy productivity averaged 2.66, 1.07, 1.41, 1.85, 2.19, and 1.11 percent, respectively. For the period from 1969 to 2019, covering those last six complete economic cycles, the annual increase in total-economy productivity averaged 1.59 percent.
The assumed ultimate annual increases in total-economy productivity are 1.93, 1.63, and 1.33 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively.3 These rates of increase are unchanged from the 2020 report.
The annual change in total-economy productivity for 2020 is estimated to be 2.43 percent under the intermediate assumptions, as employment declined more than GDP during the recession. For the intermediate assumptions, the annual rate of change in productivity is 1.46 percent for 2021, averages 0.97 percent for 2022 through 2023, is 1.40 percent for 2024, and reaches close to its ultimate value of 1.63 percent for 2025 and thereafter. For the low-cost assumptions, the annual rate of change in productivity is 2.64 percent for 2021, declines to 1.04 percent for 2023, and then reaches close to its ultimate value of 1.93 percent for 2025 and thereafter. For the high-cost assumptions, the assumed prolonged recession lowers the annual rate of change in productivity to 0.65 percent for 2021. The growth rate remains low, averaging 0.72 percent for 2022 through 2025, averages 1.33 percent for 2026 through 2030, and stabilizes at its ultimate value of 1.33 percent thereafter.
2. Price Inflation Assumptions
Changes in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI) directly affect the OASDI program through the automatic cost-of-living benefit increases. Changes in the GDP price index (GDP deflator) affect the nominal levels of GDP, wages, self-employment income, average earnings, and taxable payroll. For a given real rate of growth in average earnings, a higher price inflation rate immediately results in a higher nominal rate of growth in both earnings and revenues, while the resulting added growth in nominal benefit levels occurs with a delay, causing an overall increase (improvement) in the actuarial balance. Similarly, a lower price inflation rate causes an overall decrease in the actuarial balance.
The annual increases in the CPI averaged 4.91, 8.54, 5.30, 2.73, 2.63, and 1.73 percent over the economic cycles 1969-73, 1973-79, 1979-90, 1990‑2001, 2001-07, and 2007-19, respectively.4 The annual increases in the GDP deflator averaged 5.04, 7.54, 4.61, 2.08, 2.49, and 1.63 percent for the respective economic cycles. For the period from 1969 to 2019, covering the last six complete economic cycles, the annual increases in the CPI and the GDP deflator averaged 3.89 and 3.45 percent, respectively. The annual rate of change for 2020 is 1.21 percent for the CPI and 1.16 percent for the GDP deflator.
The assumed ultimate annual increases in the CPI are 3.00, 2.40, and 1.80 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. These values are unchanged from the 2020 report.
For the intermediate assumptions, the annual rate of change in the CPI is 3.06 percent for 2021, and reaches the ultimate growth rate of 2.40 percent for 2022 and thereafter. For the low-cost assumptions, the annual rate of change in the CPI is 3.32 percent for 2021, 3.03 percent for 2022, and reaches its ultimate growth rate of 3.00 percent for 2023 and thereafter. For the high-cost assumptions, the annual rate of change in the CPI is 2.54 percent for 2021, 1.44 percent for 2022, and reaches its ultimate growth rate of 1.80 percent for 2024 and thereafter.
The annual increase in the GDP deflator differs from the annual increase in the CPI because the two indices are constructed using different computational methods and coverage (the set of goods and services used in the measurement). The difference between the rate of change in the CPI and the rate of change in the GDP deflator is called the price differential in this report. For the period including 1969 through 2019, covering the last six complete economic cycles, the average annual price differential was 0.46 percentage point. For 2020, the annual price differential is 0.05 percentage point.
The small price differential for 2020 primarily reflects a decline in oil prices. Changes in oil prices affect the CPI much more than the GDP deflator because oil represents a much larger share of U.S. consumption than of U.S. production. Oil prices are assumed to grow at a relatively stable rate after 2022. For the intermediate assumptions, the price differential is 0.66 percentage point for 2021, 0.25 percentage point for 2022, and 0.35 percentage point for 2023 and later.
The assumed ultimate price differentials are 0.25, 0.35, and 0.45 percentage point for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost alternatives, respectively. Varying the ultimate projected price differential across alternatives recognizes the historical variation in this measure. Accordingly, the assumed ultimate annual increases in the GDP deflator are 2.75 (3.00 less 0.25), 2.05 (2.40 less 0.35), and 1.35 (1.80 less 0.45) percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost alternatives, respectively. The ultimate price differentials for the three alternatives are unchanged from the 2020 report.
3. Average Earnings Assumptions
The average level of nominal earnings in OASDI covered employment for each year has a direct effect on the size of the taxable payroll and on the future level of average benefits. In addition, under the automatic adjustment provisions in the law, growth in the average wage in the U.S. economy directly affects certain parameters used in the OASDI benefit formulas, as well as the contribution and benefit base, the exempt amounts under the retirement earnings test, the amount of earnings required for a quarter of coverage, and in certain circumstances, the automatic cost-of-living benefit increases.
Projected growth rates in average covered earnings are derived from projections of average U.S. earnings. Average U.S. earnings is defined as the ratio of the sum of total U.S. wages and net proprietors’ income to the sum of total U.S. civilian employment and Armed Forces. The growth rate in average U.S. earnings for any period is equal to the combined growth rates for total U.S. economy productivity, average hours worked, the ratio of earnings to total labor compensation (which includes fringe benefits), the ratio of total labor compensation to GDP, and the GDP deflator.
The average annual change in average hours worked was -0.21 percent over the last six complete economic cycles covering the period from 1969 to 2019. The annual change in average hours worked averaged -0.89, -0.55, ‑0.11, 0.10, ‑0.50, and -0.05 percent over the economic cycles 1969-73, 1973-79, 1979-90, 1990‑2001, 2001‑07, and 2007-19, respectively. For 2020, the annual change in average hours worked per week is estimated to be an increase of 0.40 percent, likely due to the changing composition between full-time and part-time employed workers.
The assumed ultimate annual rates of change for average hours worked are 0.05, ‑0.05, and -0.15 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. These values are unchanged from the 2020 report.
The average annual change in the ratio of earnings to total labor compensation was ‑0.14 percent from 1969 to 2019. Most of this decrease was due to the relative increase in the cost of employer-sponsored group health insurance (ESGHI) for wage workers. Assuming that the level of total employee compensation is not affected by the amount of ESGHI, any increase or decrease in the cost of ESGHI leads to a commensurate decrease or increase in other components of employee compensation, including wages. Projections of future ratios of earnings to total labor compensation follow this principle. The Trustees assume that the total amount of future ESGHI premiums will be affected by provisions of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA). A key provision of ACA affecting the projected growth in ESGHI premiums, the excise tax on ESGHI premiums (commonly referred to as the “Cadillac Tax”), was repealed in December 2019. As a result, the Trustees have assumed starting with the 2020 Trustees Report that ESGHI premiums will increase faster, and wages therefore more slowly, than was assumed in the 2010 through 2019 reports. Data from BEA indicate that the other significant component of non-wage employee compensation is employer contributions to retirement plans. This component is assumed to grow faster than employee compensation in the future as life expectancy and potential time in retirement increase.
The average annual rates of change in the ratio of wages to employee compensation from 2030 to 2095 are about -0.02, ‑0.12, and ‑0.22 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. These assumed rates are about 0.01 percentage point higher (less negative) than those assumed for the 2020 report. Under the intermediate assumptions, the ratio of wages to employee compensation declines from 0.815 for 2020 to 0.752 for 2095.
Because earnings and compensation are the same for self-employed workers, the ratio of earnings to total labor compensation includes self-employment income both in the numerator and in the denominator. As a result, the rate of change in the ratio of earnings to total labor compensation (which, under the intermediate assumptions, averages -0.10 percent from 2030 to 2095) is higher (less negative) than the rate of change in the ratio of wages to employee compensation.
The ratio of total labor compensation (i.e., employee compensation and net proprietors’ income) to GDP varies over the economic cycle and with changes in the relative sizes of different sectors of the economy. Over the last six complete economic cycles from 1969 to 2019, this ratio has averaged 0.622. The ratio declined from a recent high of 0.649 for 2001 to 0.602 in 2009, increased to 0.612 in 2012, and was 0.611 in 2019. This ratio increased to 0.628 for 2020 and is assumed to reach 0.631 by 2030. For years after 2030, the relative sizes of different sectors of the economy are assumed to remain about constant,5 and therefore the ratio of total labor compensation to GDP remains at about the 2030 level for each set of assumptions.
The projected average annual growth rate in average nominal U.S. earnings from 2030 to 2095 is about 3.56 percent for the intermediate assumptions. This growth rate reflects the average annual growth rate of approximately ‑0.10 percent for the ratio of earnings to total labor compensation, and also reflects the assumed ultimate annual growth rates of 1.63 percent for productivity, ‑0.05 percent for average hours worked, and 2.05 percent for the GDP deflator. Similarly, the projected average annual growth rates in average nominal U.S. earnings are 4.77 percent for the low-cost assumptions and 2.36 percent for the high-cost assumptions.
Over long periods, the average annual growth rate in the average wage in OASDI covered employment (henceforth the “average covered wage”) is expected to be very close to the average annual growth rate in average U.S. earnings. The estimated annual rate of change in the average covered wage is 2.73 percent for 2020 under the intermediate assumptions. From 2020 to 2030, the annual rate of change in the average covered wage averages 5.22, 3.94, and 2.75 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. The projected average annual growth rates in the average covered wage from 2030 to 2095 are 4.77, 3.55, and 2.33 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively.
4. Assumed Real Wage Differential
The real increase in the average covered wage has traditionally been expressed in the form of a real wage differential — the annual percentage change in the average covered wage minus the annual percentage change in the CPI. For the period from 1969 to 2019, covering the last six complete economic cycles, the real wage differential averaged 0.79 percentage point, the result of averages of 1.02, 0.04, 0.44, 1.47, 0.83, and 0.75 percentage points over the economic cycles 1969-73, 1973-79, 1979-90, 1990-2001, 2001‑07, and 2007-19, respectively.
For the years 2031 through 2095, the projected average annual real wage differentials for OASDI covered employment are 1.77, 1.15, and 0.53 percentage points for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. The rounded average annual real wage differentials are 0.01 percentage point higher than in the 2020 report.
The real wage differential for 2020 is estimated to be 1.52 percentage points under the intermediate assumptions. For the intermediate assumptions, the real wage differential is projected to increase to 3.16 percentage points in 2021, and then generally decline to its long-run average of 1.15 percentage points for 2031 through 2095. For the low-cost assumptions, the real wage differential is 3.66 percentage points for 2021, 3.87 percentage points in 2022, and reaches its long-run average of 1.77 percentage points for 2031 through 2095. For the high-cost assumptions, the real wage differential is 2.67 percentage points for 2021. Due to the assumed “second dip” of the “double dip” recession, it declines to -0.39 percent in 2022. It then fluctuates in years 2023 through 2030, averaging 0.86 percentage point, before reaching its long-run average of 0.53 percentage point for 2031 through 2095.
Annual percentage changea in—
Real-
wage
differential b
c1.23
c2.91
c1.21
c2.43
c2.73
c1.52

a
For rows with a single year listed, the value is the annual percentage change from the prior year. For rows with a range of years listed, the value is the compound average annual percentage change.

b
For rows with a single year listed, the value is the annual percentage change in the average annual wage in covered employment less the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index. For rows with a range of years listed, the value is the average of annual values of the real wage differential, beginning with the year following the first year of the range. Values are rounded after all computations.

c
Estimated values for 2020 vary slightly by alternative and are shown for the intermediate assumptions.

d
Economic cycles are shown from peak to peak.

e
Greater than -0.005 and less than 0.005 percent.

5. Labor Force, Employment, and Unemployment Projections
Employment is a fundamental component of economic output (GDP), taxable payroll, and the determination of OASDI benefit eligibility and benefit levels. U.S. employment is projected in two components: the size of the labor force (those employed or seeking employment) and the unemployment rate (the proportion of those in the labor force who are not employed). Table V.B2 provides the historical and projected rates of change in employment, which follow from the rates of change in the labor force, adjusted for the varying unemployment rates from year to year.
The model used by the Office of the Chief Actuary projects the civilian labor force by age, sex, marital status, and presence of children. The model was updated for this report to incorporate data from the latest complete economic cycle, and to reflect changes in the relationships among factors affecting labor force participation. Projections of the labor force participation rates reflect changes in disability prevalence, educational attainment, marriage patterns, the average level of Social Security retirement benefits, the state of the economy, and life expectancy.
The annual rate of growth in the size of the labor force decreased from an average of about 2.6 percent during the 1969-73 economic cycle and 2.7 percent during the 1973-79 cycle to 1.7 percent during the 1979-90 cycle, 1.2 percent during the 1990-2001 cycle, 1.1 percent during the 2001‑07 cycle, and 0.5 percent during the 2007-19 cycle. The labor force growth is expected to remain subdued due to a slowing of growth in the working-age population in the future — a consequence of the baby-boom generation reaching retirement ages and succeeding lower-birth-rate cohorts reaching working ages. Under the intermediate assumptions, the labor force is projected to increase by an average of 0.8 percent per year from 2020 to 2030 and 0.4 percent per year from 2030 to 2095.
Labor force participation rates are projected with a model that uses demographic and economic assumptions specific to each alternative. More optimistic economic assumptions in the low-cost alternative are consistent with higher labor force participation rates, while demographic assumptions in the low-cost alternative (such as slower improvement in longevity) are consistent with lower labor force participation rates. These economic and demographic influences have largely offsetting effects. Therefore, the projected labor force participation rates do not vary substantially across alternatives.
Historically, labor force participation rates reflect trends in demographics and pensions. Between the mid‑1960s and the mid‑1980s, labor force participation rates at ages 50 and over declined for men but were fairly stable for women. During this period, the baby-boom generation reached working age and more women entered the labor force. This increasing supply of labor allowed employers to offer attractive early retirement options. Between the mid‑1980s and the mid‑1990s, participation rates at ages 55 and older roughly stabilized for men and increased for women. Since the mid‑1990s, however, participation rates for both sexes at ages 50 and over have generally risen.
Many economic and demographic factors, including longevity, health, disability prevalence, the business cycle, incentives for retirement in Social Security and private pensions, education, and marriage patterns, will influence future labor force participation rates. The Office of the Chief Actuary models some of these factors explicitly. To model the effects of other factors related to increases in life expectancy, projected participation rates are adjusted upward for mid-career and older ages to reflect projected increases in life expectancy. For the intermediate projections, this adjustment increases the total labor force by 2.9 percent for 2095.
For men age 16 and over, the projected age-adjusted labor force participation rates6 for 2095 are 72.6, 72.3, and 71.7 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. For women age 16 and over, the projected age-adjusted labor force participation rates for 2095 are 62.2, 61.9, and 61.4 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. These age-adjusted labor force participation rates for 2095 are higher under all three alternatives than the age-adjusted rates for 2019 of 71.3 percent for men and 59.5 percent for women (based on actual age-specific rates published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics), primarily due to the Trustees’ projected increases in life expectancy.
Projected labor force participation rates in this report are slightly lower than in the 2020 report. These lower rates resulted from incorporating into the model the data and historical relationships among factors affecting labor force participation from the latest complete economic cycle (2007-19). Labor force participation rates were lower on average in recent years than in earlier periods. The updated model is consistent with the Trustees’ belief, expressed in the 2020 report, that a structural shift has occurred in the components of employment, such that long-term unemployment rates and labor force participation rates will both remain somewhat below long-term past averages, with relatively little change in the projected ratios of employment to population.
The total civilian unemployment rates are presented in table V.B2. For years through 2030, the table presents total civilian rates without adjustment for the changing age-sex distribution of the population. For years after 2030, the table presents age-sex-adjusted rates, using the age-sex distribution of the 2011 civilian labor force. Age-sex-adjusted rates allow for more meaningful comparisons across longer time periods.
The total civilian unemployment rate reflects the projected levels of unemployment for various age-sex groups of the population. Each group’s unemployment rate gradually approaches an assumed stable value within the first ten years of the projection period for all alternatives, and thus the total age-sex-adjusted civilian unemployment rate reaches its ultimate assumed value within the first ten years of the projection period.
The assumed ultimate age-sex-adjusted unemployment rates are 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. These values are 0.5 percentage point lower than in the 2020 report, consistent with the Trustees’ belief that unemployment rates will remain below long-term past averages, as mentioned above. The Trustees assume that, as the economy recovers from the recent recession, the unemployment rate will decrease from 8.1 percent for 2020 to the assumed 4.5 percent for 2024 under the intermediate assumptions. Under the low-cost assumptions, the ultimate unemployment rate is reached in 2023. Under the high-cost assumptions, the unemployment rate declines to 6.9 percent in 2021, then rises to a peak of 8.2 percent in 2022, and then gradually decreases to the ultimate unemployment rate in 2029.7
6. Gross Domestic Product Projections
The value of real GDP is equal to the product of three components: (1) productivity (i.e., output per hour worked), (2) average weekly total employment,8 and (3) average hours worked per week, times 52. Consequently, the growth rate in real GDP is equal to the combined growth rates for productivity, total employment, and average hours worked. For the period from 1969 to 2019, which covers the last six complete economic cycles, the average annual growth in real GDP was 2.7 percent, combining average growth rates of 1.6 percent for productivity, 1.3 percent for total employment, and ‑0.2 percent for average hours worked (1.027 = 1.016 × 1.013 × 0.998). The real GDP for 2020 is 3.5 percent below its 2019 level.
For the intermediate assumptions, the average annual growth in real GDP is 2.6 percent from 2020 to 2030, combining the average growth rates of 1.46 percent for productivity, 1.14 percent for total employment, and ‑0.05 percent for average hours worked. The projected average annual growth in real GDP of 2.6 percent from 2020 to 2030 is higher than the underlying sustainable trend rate of 2.1 percent, due to the assumed recovery from the recession. After 2030, the annual growth in real GDP follows the sustainable trend rate and averages 2.0 percent, which combines the projected ultimate annual growth rate of 1.63 percent for productivity, average annual growth rate of 0.40 percent for total employment, and the ultimate annual growth rate of ‑0.05 percent for average hours worked per week. The projected growth rate of real GDP is lower than the past average growth rate mainly because the working-age population is expected to grow more slowly than in the past.
For the low-cost assumptions, the annual growth in real GDP averages 3.4 percent from 2020 to 2030 and 2.7 percent from 2030 to 2095. For the high-cost assumptions, the annual growth in real GDP averages 1.7 percent from 2020 to 2030 and 1.2 percent from 2030 to 2095.
7. Interest Rates
Table V.B2 presents average annual nominal and real interest rates for newly issued trust fund securities. The nominal rate is the average of the nominal interest rates for special U.S. Government obligations issuable to the trust funds in each of the 12 months of the year. Interest for these securities is compounded semiannually, or at redemption if sooner. The real interest rate is defined as the annual yield rate for investments in these securities divided by the annual rate of growth in the CPI for the first year after issuance. The real rate shown for each year reflects the actual realized (historical) or expected (future) real yield on securities issuable in the prior year.
To develop a reasonable range of assumed ultimate future real interest rates for the three alternatives, the Office of the Chief Actuary examined historical experience for the last six complete economic cycles. For the period from 1969 to 2019, the real interest rate averaged 2.4 percent per year. The real interest rates averaged 1.6, -1.0, 5.1, 4.1, 2.0, and 0.8 percent per year over the economic cycles 1969-73, 1973-79, 1979-90, 1990-2001, 2001-07, and 2007-19, respectively. The assumed ultimate real interest rates are 2.8 percent, 2.3 percent, and 1.8 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively. These rates are unchanged from the 2020 report.
The average annual nominal interest rate was approximately 2.2 percent for securities newly issuable in 2019, implying an effective annual yield of 2.2 percent for securities held one year. The CPI rose from 2019 to 2020 by approximately 1.2 percent. The annual real interest rate for 2020 was therefore 1.0 percent. From 2020 to 2030, projected nominal interest rates depend on changes in the economic cycle and in the CPI. When combined with the ultimate CPI assumptions of 3.0, 2.4, and 1.8 percent, the assumed ultimate real interest rates produce ultimate nominal interest rates of 5.8 percent for the low-cost assumptions, 4.7 percent for the intermediate assumptions, and 3.6 percent for the high-cost assumptions. These nominal rates for newly issued trust fund securities reach their ultimate levels by 2030.
Average annual
unemployment rate a
Annual percentage changeb in—
Labor
force c
Total
employment d
Real
GDP e
Nominal f
Real g

a
The Office of the Chief Actuary adjusts the civilian unemployment rates for 2031 and later to the age-sex distribution of the civilian labor force in 2011. For years through 2030, the values are the total rates without adjustment for the changing age-sex distribution.

b
For rows with a single year listed, the value is the annual percentage change from the prior year. For rows with a range of years listed, the value is the compounded average annual percentage change.

c
The U.S. civilian labor force.

d
Total U.S. military and civilian employment.

e
The value of the total output of goods and services in 2012 dollars.

f
The average of the nominal interest rates, compounded semiannually, for special public-debt obligations issuable to the trust funds in each of the 12 months of the year.

g
The realized or expected annual real yield for each year on securities issuable in the prior year.

h
Greater than -0.05 and less than 0.05 percent.

i
Economic cycles are shown from peak to peak.


1
On a monthly basis, economic activity peaked in February 2020, but the decline in March was sharp enough that the output in the first quarter of 2020 was substantially below the output in the fourth quarter of 2019. See https://www.nber.org/news/business-cycle-dating-committee-announcement-june-8-2020.

2
Historical levels of real GDP are from the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Historical total hours worked are provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and cover all U.S. Armed Forces and civilian employment.

3
These assumptions for total-economy productivity are consistent with ultimate annual increases in private nonfarm business productivity of 2.36, 2.00, and 1.63 percent. Private nonfarm business productivity excludes the farm, government, nonprofit institution, and private household sectors.

4
BLS produces a series called the Consumer Price Index Research Series Using Current Methods (CPI‑U‑RS) that approximates the measured rate of inflation over the 1978-2020 period had the method currently used been in effect since 1978. BLS does not revise the CPI values published in earlier years, for which different methods were used. These CPI published values are shown in table V.B1. The Trustees use an adjusted CPI series based on the CPI-U-RS when setting the ultimate price inflation assumption because it provides a time series that is consistent with the current method for computing the CPI.

5
The sole exception is the employment in the U.S. Armed Forces, which has declined in size over the last 40 years, and is assumed to remain at its 2019 level throughout the 75-year projection period.

6
The Office of the Chief Actuary adjusts the labor force participation rates to the 2011 age distribution of the civilian noninstitutional U.S. population.

7
The assumed ultimate unemployment rates are age-sex-adjusted rates. For the high-cost assumptions, the age-sex-adjusted unemployment rate in 2029 is 5.5 percent, while the unadjusted rate is 5.4 percent, as shown in table V.B2.

8
Total employment is the sum of the U.S. Armed Forces and total civilian employment, which can be expressed as a product of the total civilian labor force and the complement of the unemployment rate.


Table of Contents Previous Next Tables Figures Index
SSA Home | Privacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map | Actuarial Publications August 31, 2021