Acquiescence Rulings

Third Circuit Court

Table of Contents

AR 86-4(3): Paskel v. Heckler, 768 F.2d 540 (3d Cir. 1985) Necessity of a Determination under Sections 225(b) and/or 1631(a)(6) of the Social Security Act for a Disability Benefits Recipient Engaged in an Approved Vocational Rehabilitation Program Prior to Cessation of His/Her Benefits Based on Medical Recovery — Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act

AR 86-6(3) (Rescinded 7/14/95): Aubrey v. Richardson, 462 F.2d 782 (3rd Cir. 1972); Shelnutt v. Heckler, 723 F.2d 1131 (3rd Cir. 1983) — Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding Presumption of Death — Title II of the Social Security Act

AR 86-13(3): McNeal v. Schweiker, 711 F.2d 18 (3d Cir. 1983) — Child's Benefits — Contributions for Support — Title II of the Social Security Act

AR 92-1(3): Mazza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 903 F.2d 953 (3d Cir. 1990) — Order of Effectuation in Concurrent Application Cases — (Title II/Title XVI).

AR 01-1(3): Sykes v. Apfel, 228 F.3d 259 (3d Cir. 2000) — Using the Grid Rules as a Framework for Decisionmaking When an Individual's Occupational Base is Eroded by a Nonexertional Limitation — Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.

---

Back to Acquiescence Rulings Table of Contents