Hearing Office Average Processing Time Ranking Report
FY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 9/25/2010 Through 05/27/2011)

A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of days until final disposition of the hearing request. The average shown will be a combined average for all cases completed in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category.

National Ranking Report
By Average Processing Time
Fiscal YTD Ending: 05/27/2011
Workdays: 167

Rank Hearing Office Region Processing Time
1
MAYAGUEZ
02
185
2
PONCE
02
192
3
SHREVEPORT
06
223
4
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN
06
237
5
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX *
06
240
6
KINGSPORT
04
262
7
PADUCAH
04
266
8
MIDDLESBORO
04
268
9
COVINGTON GA
04
274
10
FORT SMITH
06
277
11
MCALESTER
06
279
12
HUNTINGTON
03
281
13
BROOKLYN
02
283
13
FORT WORTH
06
283
13
ALEXANDRIA
06
283
16
CHARLOTTESVILLE
03
284
16
ELKINS PARK
03
284
18
HOUSTON-BISSONNET
06
288
19
NEW ORLEANS
06
289
20
LIVONIA MI
05
290
21
NORFOLK
03
291
21
CHATTANOOGA
04
291
23
SAN ANTONIO
06
292
24
DALLAS NORTH
06
293
25
ATLANTA NORTH
04
297
26
KNOXVILLE
04
298
26
FAYETTEVILLE NC
04
298
28
METAIRIE
06
300
29
CHARLOTTE
04
301
30
VALPARAISO IN
05
302
31
DALLAS DOWNTOWN
06
304
32
GREENVILLE
04
307
32
DOVER
03
307
34
RICHMOND
03
308
34
HONOLULU
09
308
36
CREVE COEUR
07
309
37
LONG BEACH
09
311
37
EVANSVILLE
05
311
37
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN
04
311
40
LEXINGTON
04
315
40
MADISON
05
315
42
EVANSTON
05
316
43
TOPEKA KS
07
319
44
HARRISBURG
03
320
45
CHARLESTON SC
04
323
46
HATTIESBURG
04
325
47
BOSTON
01
328
48
ALBUQUERQUE
06
329
48
SPOKANE
10
329
50
SAVANNAH
04
331
50
WEST DES MOINES
07
331
52
STOCKTON
09
333
53
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
09
334
53
QUEENS
02
334
55
SAN JUAN
02
335
56
AKRON OH
05
338
57
ALBANY
02
340
57
SOUTH JERSEY
02
340
57
RALEIGH
04
340
60
LOS ANGELES WEST
09
342
61
OKLAHOMA CITY
06
343
62
WICHITA
07
345
62
SYRACUSE
02
345
64
JERICHO
02
346
64
TUCSON
09
346
64
LITTLE ROCK
06
346
67
SAN BERNARDINO
09
347
68
JACKSON
04
348
68
CHARLESTON WV
03
348
70
PHILADELPHIA EAST
03
350
71
TULSA
06
351
72
ORANGE
09
356
73
SACRAMENTO
09
358
73
WILKES BARRE
03
358
75
PORTLAND ME
01
360
75
PHILADELPHIA
03
360
75
JACKSONVILLE
04
360
78
MACON
04
361
78
DETROIT
05
361
80
MILWAUKEE
05
362
80
COLUMBIA SC
04
362
80
MANCHESTER
01
362
83
OAK PARK
05
363
83
ORLAND PARK
05
363
85
DOWNEY
09
364
86
BALTIMORE
03
367
87
ROCHESTER *
02
368
87
TAMPA
04
368
89
FT LAUDERDALE
04
370
90
PEORIA
05
375
90
PHOENIX NORTH
09
375
92
SEVEN FIELDS
03
376
93
MT PLEASANT MI
05
377
94
HARTFORD
01
378
94
PORTLAND OR
10
378
96
SPRINGFIELD MA
01
379
97
ORLANDO
04
380
98
SAN RAFAEL
09
382
99
SANTA BARBARA
09
384
99
NEW YORK
02
384
101
MORGANTOWN
03
386
101
JOHNSTOWN
03
386
103
PASADENA
09
387
104
FLINT
05
390
105
DENVER
08
391
106
SEATTLE
10
392
107
FORT WAYNE
05
393
107
TALLAHASSEE FL
04
393
109
SAN DIEGO
09
394
110
SAN FRANCISCO
09
395
110
SALT LAKE CITY
08
395
110
WHITE PLAINS
02
395
113
FORT MYERS FL *
04
397
114
ST PETERSBURG FL
04
403
114
MEMPHIS
04
403
114
LAS VEGAS
09
403
117
LOUISVILLE
04
404
118
PROVIDENCE
01
406
118
FARGO
08
406
120
NASHVILLE
04
408
121
CHICAGO
05
409
122
BILLINGS
08
411
123
MOBILE
04
413
123
SAN JOSE
09
413
125
KANSAS CITY
07
418
125
MINNEAPOLIS
05
418
127
MONTGOMERY
04
420
128
COLORADO SPRINGS
08
422
129
CINCINNATI
05
423
130
ANCHORAGE AK
10
424
131
OAK BROOK
05
427
132
TUPELO
04
429
132
FRESNO
09
429
134
NEWARK
02
430
135
MIAMI
04
431
136
NEW HAVEN
01
432
137
FLORENCE
04
433
138
WASHINGTON
03
436
139
GREENSBORO
04
437
139
ST LOUIS
07
437
141
BRONX
02
438
142
ROANOKE
03
439
143
OMAHA
07
440
144
BIRMINGHAM
04
442
145
OAKLAND
09
446
146
EUGENE
10
455
147
PITTSBURGH
03
457
148
PHOENIX
09
462
149
TOLEDO OH
05
465
150
SPRINGFIELD MO
07
469
151
GRAND RAPIDS
05
483
152
LANSING
05
489
153
INDIANAPOLIS
05
492
154
CLEVELAND
05
498
155
DAYTON
05
502
156
BUFFALO
02
503
157
COLUMBUS
05
517

* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.

 

Disclaimer

These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.